2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182021001840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lurking in the water: testing eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for ecosystem-wide parasite detection

Abstract: In the light of global biodiversity change and emerging disease, there is an urgent need to establish efficient monitoring programmes of parasites in aquatic ecosystems. However, parasite identification is time-consuming, requires a high degree of taxonomic expertize and in general requires lethal sampling. The use of environmental DNA methodology to identify parasites has the potential to circumvent these limitations. This study evaluates the use of eDNA metabarcoding to detect the presence of all species of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2015, 2023; Thomas et al. 2022). However, PCR bias and other factors may limit eDNA metabarcoding's sensitivity (Harper et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2015, 2023; Thomas et al. 2022). However, PCR bias and other factors may limit eDNA metabarcoding's sensitivity (Harper et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly sensitive single-species qPCR-based approaches are clearly effective for detecting small and cryptic freshwater parasites, but multispecies approaches, such as eDNA metabarcoding, may offer additional management utility in host-parasite systems. Environmental DNA metabarcoding can generate vast amounts of ecological data that can be used to explore host-parasite dynamics and reveal potential ecological factors influencing their distributions (Bass et al 2015(Bass et al , 2023Thomas et al 2022). However, PCR bias and other factors may limit eDNA metabarcoding's sensitivity (Harper et al 2018), suggesting that future research is needed to verify whether this multispecies approach can match qPCR's sensitivity for detecting low-concentration gill lice eDNA.…”
Section: Management Implications and Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huge works remain to be done to characterise both the fauna involved in supplying trematodes that interact with species of the genus Schistosoma in their intermediate hosts, and the fauna involved in maintaining the local life cycles of these trematodes. We believe that the newly available metabarcoding tools such as used in the present study (19,34,40), combined with the implementation of large and well documented sequence datasets, provide a promising avenue to characterise trematode life cycles.…”
Section: Discussion / Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, similar to many other developing countries, we are currently facing a deficit in knowledge on biodiversity, with a great shortfall in past knowledge to guide the policy on the management and protection of parasitic species along with their application in the conservation of ecological units (parasites and hosts) for the future. Currently, the application of non-lethal tools, such as eDNA, to assess parasitic communities is still in the developing and refinement stages, and these are not yet accepted as default tools for detection ( Thomas et al, 2022 ). In addition, comparative libraries for the datasets obtained using non-lethal tools first need to be populated prior to its consideration as the primary method of assessment, and in South Africa, there is much to be done before such tools can be utilised effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%