2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03472-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung ultrasound can predict response to the prone position in awake non-intubated patients with COVID‑19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was only three studies that categorized prone position effect as responders and nonresponders [ 8 ▪▪ , 9 ▪▪ , 32 ]. The definition of responders was variable, such as prepost prone lung ultrasound (LUS) score reduction, PaO 2 increase and SpO 2 /FiO 2 increase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was only three studies that categorized prone position effect as responders and nonresponders [ 8 ▪▪ , 9 ▪▪ , 32 ]. The definition of responders was variable, such as prepost prone lung ultrasound (LUS) score reduction, PaO 2 increase and SpO 2 /FiO 2 increase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second study, aeration changes in posterior fields induced by the first 3 h of prone positioning were significantly greater in patients with positive responses and associated with greater levels of oxygenation after 7 days of treatment. Moreover, the lung aeration changes correlated well with the reduction in dead space [ 85 ]. Rousset et al confirm that prone responders present a greater LUS reaeration score at both an early and late stage of prone positioning, corresponding with an increase in end-expiratory lung volume [ 82 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rousset et al confirm that prone responders present a greater LUS reaeration score at both an early and late stage of prone positioning, corresponding with an increase in end-expiratory lung volume [ 82 ]. Similarly, in COVID-19 pneumonia, the improvement in oxygenation following pronation was associated with an improvement in both the global and posterior LUS scores [ 85 ]. LUS was proven to be a reliable bedside tool for monitoring lung aeration across the different phases of prone positioning in ARDS patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the study population was not standardized for the COVID-19 ARDS phenotype or disease history and thus NIV might have been applied in patients with different lung involvements. Third, diaphragmatic and lung ultrasound were performed at baseline in supine position and after 1 h following prone position application, as also recently proposed in COVID-19 patients for sonographic assessment of lung aeration alone [37]. Different results might be obtained at different timepoints, i.e., 3-6 h from prone positioning onset as otherwise proposed [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%