The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung ultrasonography: A prognostic tool in non-ICU hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vast majority of patients, there was a bilateral involvement, with an evident predominance of interstitial lesions (B lines) and the most affected regions were the posteroinferior ones. In contrast to previous studies, we found a higher incidence of subpleural consolidations [ 23 ]. Pleural effusion was detected only in a minority of patients, thus confirming previous reports [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of patients, there was a bilateral involvement, with an evident predominance of interstitial lesions (B lines) and the most affected regions were the posteroinferior ones. In contrast to previous studies, we found a higher incidence of subpleural consolidations [ 23 ]. Pleural effusion was detected only in a minority of patients, thus confirming previous reports [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When performing ROC analysis, a total LUS score of 9 at admission was a reliable cut-off value to rule out death and ICU transfer (sensitivity 100%; specificity 45%), while at 72 hours a cut-off value of 17 accurately predicted the primary outcome (sensitivity 89%; specificity 85%). These data support a possible role of LUS in the choice of the best intensity care setting for the patient [24] .…”
Section: Utility: Discarding Other Diseases and Complicationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“… LUS score < 10 predicts secondary outcome (discharge from the ED) with OR 20.9 Ji et al [22] 280 Non-ICU wards In-hospital mortality 12/0-36 LUS + age + lymphocyte count + comorbidities better predict primary or secondary (ARDS) outcomes than clinical variables only. LUS score > 12 predicts primary or secondary outcomes with 91.9% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity Rubio-Gracia J et al [23] 130 Non-ICU wards Composite of in-hospital death and ICU admission 12/0-48 LUS score > 22 independently predicts primary outcome Casella et al [24] 190 Non-ICU wards Composite of in-hospital death and ICU admission 11/0-33 LUS score at admission predicts primary outcome in the univariate model but in the multivariate model P/F is the only predictive variable. At 72 hours a LUS score predicts the primary outcome with OR 1.36.…”
Section: Utility: Discarding Other Diseases and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol consisted of the evaluation of six regions in each hemithorax (two anterior, two lateral, two posterior); a scoring system (0-3) was used to evaluate and grade the presence of interstitial pattern (score 1 or 2) or consolidation (score 3) in each region. Data regarding the value of LUS in predicting the evolution toward ARDS and/or death have been recently published by our [3] and other groups [4]. The examination was repeated again if clinically indicated, mainly in the presence of worsening respiratory condition.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%