Abstract:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a significant cause of acute respiratory failure worldwide, leading to irreversible fibrotic lung disease. In patients with persistent respiratory failure after acute COVID-19 infection, lung transplant is an emerging option. Here, we have presented a case where the patient required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support for 33 days until a bilateral lung transplant was performed on day 71 after the initial COVID-19 infection. The early… Show more
“…First, there was a signi cant collapse in terms of available organs around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic [18,19] and Poland was no exception in this regard [9,19,20]. Second, due to the upward shift of the diapharm in patients with COVID-19, there is rapidly progressive brosis and a loss of tidal volumes, which makes it extremely di cult to nd suitable donors for LT [2,10,21]. In these particular cases, only short stature donors (or older pediatric donors) may be considered, as downsizing of donor lungs is technically very demanding [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, due to the upward shift of the diapharm in patients with COVID-19, there is rapidly progressive brosis and a loss of tidal volumes, which makes it extremely di cult to nd suitable donors for LT [2,10,21]. In these particular cases, only short stature donors (or older pediatric donors) may be considered, as downsizing of donor lungs is technically very demanding [21]. Third, choosing the right recipient is very challenging.…”
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may serve as a bridge to
successful lung transplantation (LT) in selected patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-
19) pneumonia. Compliance with the recognized LT criteria however, may be impossible to
be met in this particular and extremely challenging group of patients. This situation create
huge moral and ethical dilemmas. To indicate this, we decided to explore this difficult topic
and present how non-compliance to the recognized LT criteria enabled us to perform three
successful and life-saving LT procedures in COVID-19 patients.
Methods: Data of all consecutive patients on ECMO support as rescue treatment for COVID-
19 pneumonia, awaiting LT at SCHD between October 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 were
reviewed.
Results: 18 patients on ECMO entered the list for LT at SCHD (mean age: 40.5 ± 5.6 years,
range 28–48 years). Mean duration of ECMO was 29.6 ± 15.5 days (range 6–71 days). 11
patients died: either during LT (n = 3), post-LT (n = 1), or on ECMO awaiting LT (n = 7).
The overall mortality rate in this group was 61.1%. Survivors (n=7) were either successfully
transplanted (n = 3) or weaned from ECMO (n = 4). In the medical literature, there are several
enthusiastic case reports describing successful LTs, however there might be a significant
publication bias in this area, as failed procedures probably remain largely under-reported.
There are no data to indicate the right time for LT in post-COVID-19 patients. Experts in this
field require minimum recovery period of 4 weeks to exclude native lung recovery, active
participation in physical rehabilitation and the possibility of providing informed consent to
proceed with LT. All these conditions were impossible to be met in our patients awaiting LT
on ECMO support.
Conclusions: Traditional lung transplantation criteria are difficult to be applied in COVID-19
patients requiring ECMO support due to medical and ethical reasons. Performing LT without
prior consent of patients violates the ethical principles of solid organ transplants, but may be
life-saving in some patients.
“…First, there was a signi cant collapse in terms of available organs around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic [18,19] and Poland was no exception in this regard [9,19,20]. Second, due to the upward shift of the diapharm in patients with COVID-19, there is rapidly progressive brosis and a loss of tidal volumes, which makes it extremely di cult to nd suitable donors for LT [2,10,21]. In these particular cases, only short stature donors (or older pediatric donors) may be considered, as downsizing of donor lungs is technically very demanding [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, due to the upward shift of the diapharm in patients with COVID-19, there is rapidly progressive brosis and a loss of tidal volumes, which makes it extremely di cult to nd suitable donors for LT [2,10,21]. In these particular cases, only short stature donors (or older pediatric donors) may be considered, as downsizing of donor lungs is technically very demanding [21]. Third, choosing the right recipient is very challenging.…”
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may serve as a bridge to
successful lung transplantation (LT) in selected patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-
19) pneumonia. Compliance with the recognized LT criteria however, may be impossible to
be met in this particular and extremely challenging group of patients. This situation create
huge moral and ethical dilemmas. To indicate this, we decided to explore this difficult topic
and present how non-compliance to the recognized LT criteria enabled us to perform three
successful and life-saving LT procedures in COVID-19 patients.
Methods: Data of all consecutive patients on ECMO support as rescue treatment for COVID-
19 pneumonia, awaiting LT at SCHD between October 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021 were
reviewed.
Results: 18 patients on ECMO entered the list for LT at SCHD (mean age: 40.5 ± 5.6 years,
range 28–48 years). Mean duration of ECMO was 29.6 ± 15.5 days (range 6–71 days). 11
patients died: either during LT (n = 3), post-LT (n = 1), or on ECMO awaiting LT (n = 7).
The overall mortality rate in this group was 61.1%. Survivors (n=7) were either successfully
transplanted (n = 3) or weaned from ECMO (n = 4). In the medical literature, there are several
enthusiastic case reports describing successful LTs, however there might be a significant
publication bias in this area, as failed procedures probably remain largely under-reported.
There are no data to indicate the right time for LT in post-COVID-19 patients. Experts in this
field require minimum recovery period of 4 weeks to exclude native lung recovery, active
participation in physical rehabilitation and the possibility of providing informed consent to
proceed with LT. All these conditions were impossible to be met in our patients awaiting LT
on ECMO support.
Conclusions: Traditional lung transplantation criteria are difficult to be applied in COVID-19
patients requiring ECMO support due to medical and ethical reasons. Performing LT without
prior consent of patients violates the ethical principles of solid organ transplants, but may be
life-saving in some patients.
“…Most of the early available case reports only document short-term posttransplant outcomes on single patients or case series. 7,8,11,[16][17][18] Very recently, analyses of larger patient cohorts over a longer time span have been published: A retrospective analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database reported outcomes on 214 patients who received lung transplantation for COVID-19-related respiratory failure in the United States 2 with a median followup of 1.9 mo. Patients were relatively young (mean age 52 y) and predominantly male (79.2%)‚ and included a high percentage of patients of Hispanic origin (36.6%), consistent with reports that have identified a higher risk of COVID-19-related respiratory failure in this group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 Secondary colonization or infection with bacterial or fungal organisms is a common complication of prolonged critical illness, mechanical ventilation, and pleural instrumentation. It is largely unclear how this affects posttransplant outcomes, although some cases of postoperative morbidity and mortality related to bacterial 17 and fungal sepsis 16 have been reported.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.