2015
DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung Nodule and Cancer Detection in Computed Tomography Screening

Abstract: Fundamental to the diagnosis of lung cancer in CT scans is the detection and interpretation of lung nodules. As the capabilities of CT scanners have advanced, higher levels of spatial resolution reveal tinier lung abnormalities. While not all detected lung nodules should be reported, radiologists strive to detect all nodules that might have relevance to cancer diagnosis. Although medium to large lung nodules are detected consistently, inter-reader agreement and reader sensitivity for lung nodule detection dimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, for identification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, we relied on identification of the same nodule by two reference readers using clinical dose settings. While this methodology can result in substantial variability in estimates of reader performance (39, 40), we are estimating the effect of dose on performance, so the relative performance of the readers across the dose levels (rather than the absolute estimate) is the variable of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, for identification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, we relied on identification of the same nodule by two reference readers using clinical dose settings. While this methodology can result in substantial variability in estimates of reader performance (39, 40), we are estimating the effect of dose on performance, so the relative performance of the readers across the dose levels (rather than the absolute estimate) is the variable of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). These small and faint nodules are often missed by radiologists or CAD systems . Second, vessels are the dominant normal anatomy within the lungs often having similar CT values and cross‐sectional shapes as those of nodules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These small and faint nodules are often missed by radiologists or CAD systems. 16,17 Second, vessels are the dominant normal anatomy within the lungs often having similar CT values and cross-sectional shapes as those of nodules. Therefore, vessels and vessel-crossings can be easily misidentified as nodules with increased false positives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large number of false positives (i.e., a misclassified non-nodule as a nodule) occur at the cost of high sensitivity. These numerous false positives that require extra attention from radiologists also hinder the practical use of CAD systems [12]. Second, the use of volumetric 3D images requires very high computational cost and huge memory storage, which directly affect the speed of the training and detection processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%