1996
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.2.964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung mechanics during induced bronchoconstriction

Abstract: To elucidate differences in lung mechanics, we investigated the relative changes of partial forced expiratory flows at 50 and 30% of vital capacity, pulmonary resistance (RL), dynamic elastance (Edyn), and the effects of a deep inhalation (DI) on maximal flows, Edyn, and RL in eight asthmatic and eight normal individuals during bronchial challenges with methacholine, histamine, and ATP. RL was partitioned into inspiratory and expiratory resistance. Different constrictor agents did not induce specific patterns … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
103
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these findings are all consistent with the greater velocity of contraction of asthmatic smooth muscle, as has been shown by MA et al [37] in isolated human asthmatic ASM cells and by MITCHELL et al [38] in passively sensitised human bronchial smooth muscle. In the studies by PELLEGRINO et al [19] and JACKSON et al [35], the relative magnitude of the reversal was less in asthmatic subjects. Thus the relative magnitude of the reversal, rather than the reversal itself, appears to differentiate the asthmatic response to induced obstruction.…”
Section: Evidence Of Asm Involvement In Asthmamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, these findings are all consistent with the greater velocity of contraction of asthmatic smooth muscle, as has been shown by MA et al [37] in isolated human asthmatic ASM cells and by MITCHELL et al [38] in passively sensitised human bronchial smooth muscle. In the studies by PELLEGRINO et al [19] and JACKSON et al [35], the relative magnitude of the reversal was less in asthmatic subjects. Thus the relative magnitude of the reversal, rather than the reversal itself, appears to differentiate the asthmatic response to induced obstruction.…”
Section: Evidence Of Asm Involvement In Asthmamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is known that lung volume is a key determinant of airway resistance (Raw) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and that changes in lung volume associated with tidal breathing and deep inspiration differentially modulate airway conductance (Gaw) in normal and asthmatic subjects [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Although it is speculated that the target of modulation by lung volume change is the smooth muscle embedded in the airways [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], a direct relationship between lung volume change and alteration in ASM contractility is yet to be established.…”
Section: Evidence Of Asm Involvement In Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, recent observation shows that ATP levels are significantly elevated in the airways of asthmatic patients after allergen challenge and in mice in a model of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma [91]. Aerosolized ATP triggers bronchoconstriction in healthy and asthmatic individuals [92]. ATP induces release of neuropeptides (neurokinin A, SP) from adjacent nerve terminals.…”
Section: Purinergic Signaling In Allergic Airway Inflammation: Focus mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RL and Edyn were first measured on at least 10 or more spontaneous tidal breaths and then for at least 90 s after a deep inhalation (DI) to TLC. This first set of maneuvers was used to calculate baseline RL and Edyn and to assess their recovery after DI by linearly regressing all values recorded from the point at which spontaneous tidal breathing was resumed to the point at which a clear plateau was observed (24). Thus, for each experimental condition, there were 1) baseline values of RL and Edyn, referred as to pre-DI; 2) intercept values indicating the magnitude of the effects of DI; and 3) slope values indicating recovery times after DI.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%