2006
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung function tests in neonates and infants with chronic lung disease: Lung and chest‐wall mechanics

Abstract: This is the fifth paper in a review series that summarizes available data and critically discusses the potential role of lung function testing in infants and young children with acute neonatal respiratory disorders and chronic lung disease of infancy (CLDI). This review focuses on respiratory mechanics, including chest-wall and tissue mechanics, obtained in the intensive care setting and in infants during unassisted breathing. Following orientation of the reader to the subject area, we focused comments on area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(189 reference statements)
0
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11]13,14 Problems in study design, including failure to recruit sufficient subjects or appropriate controls, ambiguity regarding the definition of CLDI, 3,[19][20][21] or true clinical status at time of testing, 22 use of inappropriate equipment or methods with respect to underlying pathophysiology and lack of data on repeatability with which to interpret what constitutes a clinically significant change, 14,15 have all contributed to contradictory results and difficulties in drawing firm conclusions from many of the published studies in this field. If we are to avoid such problems in the future, there is an urgent need for collaboration between clinicians and physiologists to facilitate optimal use of the exciting technological developments.…”
Section: Limitations Of Published Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8][9][10][11]13,14 Problems in study design, including failure to recruit sufficient subjects or appropriate controls, ambiguity regarding the definition of CLDI, 3,[19][20][21] or true clinical status at time of testing, 22 use of inappropriate equipment or methods with respect to underlying pathophysiology and lack of data on repeatability with which to interpret what constitutes a clinically significant change, 14,15 have all contributed to contradictory results and difficulties in drawing firm conclusions from many of the published studies in this field. If we are to avoid such problems in the future, there is an urgent need for collaboration between clinicians and physiologists to facilitate optimal use of the exciting technological developments.…”
Section: Limitations Of Published Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 During the past year, a series of review articles in Pediatric Pulmonology has responded to this challenge by summarizing the published literature on lung function in infants and young children with acute neonatal respiratory disorders and CLDI. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] So what have we learnt so far, and what are the next steps?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lung function tests in neonates and infants with CLD were recently reviewed which showed high resistance and low compliance. 23 Higher airway resistance, measured by plethysmography, was also found in preterm preschool children without CLD. 24 The increased Rint in children with CLD in this study supports the finding of other studies that assessed airways resistance in other ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique [64] is capable of simulating the forced expiratory manoeuvre and it has also been employed in infants; however, it cannot be accomplished without sedation. Moreover, while it may be sensitive to the presence of lung disease, it lacks specificity and is difficult to link to structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%