2009
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncp183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung dosimetry for inhaled radon progeny in smokers

Abstract: Cigarette smoking may change the morphological and physiological parameters of the lung. Thus the primary objective of the present study was to investigate to what extent these smoke-induced changes can modify deposition, clearance and resulting doses of inhaled radon progeny relative to healthy non-smokers (NSs). Doses to sensitive bronchial target cells were computed for four categories of smokers: (1) Light, short-term (LST) smokers, (2) light, long-term (LLT) smokers, (3) heavy, short-term (HST) smokers an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All our smoker subjects had low daily cigarette intake and most of them in an acute exposure. These data are in accordance with Baias et al (2010), who determined that the effects of acute smoking even protect the lung from radiation damage due to an increase in mucus secretion and in the thickness of this layer that can protect cells from alpha particles emitted from the gel phase of mucus layer. However, these apparent "advantages" of smoking disappear with continued exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All our smoker subjects had low daily cigarette intake and most of them in an acute exposure. These data are in accordance with Baias et al (2010), who determined that the effects of acute smoking even protect the lung from radiation damage due to an increase in mucus secretion and in the thickness of this layer that can protect cells from alpha particles emitted from the gel phase of mucus layer. However, these apparent "advantages" of smoking disappear with continued exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Some of them include the impact of smoking on exposure, others exposure–dose relation and others dose-response relation in smokers and non-smokers as was reported by Baias et al [21]. Although the study does not provide evidence relevant to each of the reasons, the probable explanations include differences in lung morphometry of target cells, thickness of the mucous layer and mucociliary clearance between smokers and non-smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Accordingly, a protective effect of smoking against radon induced LC was hypothesized and justified by thicker mucus layer and increased mucus velocities. Contrary, Baias et al (2010) calculated the local radiation dose due to inhaled radon progeny in bronchial target cells to be twice as high in heavy smokers compares to never smokers. However, the apparent “LC protection by smoking” perhaps results from interaction in opposite direction of genes at chromosome 15q25.1 with smoking- respectively radon-induced LC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%