2018
DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2016.1359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung Deposition of the Dry Powder Fixed Combination Beclometasone Dipropionate Plus Formoterol Fumarate Using NEXThaler® Device in Healthy Subjects, Asthmatic Patients, and COPD Patients

Abstract: Background: This study evaluated the lung deposition and the distribution pattern in the airways of a fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (FF) (100/6 μg) delivered as an extrafine dry powder formulation (mass median aerodynamic diameter, MMAD (μm) BDP = 1.5; FF = 1.4) through the NEXThaler® device in healthy subjects, asthmatics, and patients with COPD.Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 10), asthmatic patients (n = 9; 30%≤FEV1 < 80%), and COPD patients (n = 9; FEV1/FVC ≤70… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Compared with nonextrafine formulations, the intrapulmonary deposition of extrafine particles studied with the gamma scintigraphy technique, multi-slice CT scans, and computational fluid dynamics in subjects with moderate and severe COPD exhibited better regional lung deposition as well as significant improvements in static lung volumes and a reduction in extrathoracic drug deposition. 147,150,189 This observation supports other results indicating that exposure to lower doses of ICS with the administration of an extrafine formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate yielded comparable results in preventing exacerbations and better odds of treatment stability at 2 y compared with nonextrafine fluticasone in subjects with moderate to very severe air-flow obstruction. 190 In subjects with COPD, the administration of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol significantly improved FVC, 191 air trapping, 192,193 dyspnea 193 and quality of life.…”
Section: Delivery Systems Targeting Small Airwayssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…3 Compared with nonextrafine formulations, the intrapulmonary deposition of extrafine particles studied with the gamma scintigraphy technique, multi-slice CT scans, and computational fluid dynamics in subjects with moderate and severe COPD exhibited better regional lung deposition as well as significant improvements in static lung volumes and a reduction in extrathoracic drug deposition. 147,150,189 This observation supports other results indicating that exposure to lower doses of ICS with the administration of an extrafine formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate yielded comparable results in preventing exacerbations and better odds of treatment stability at 2 y compared with nonextrafine fluticasone in subjects with moderate to very severe air-flow obstruction. 190 In subjects with COPD, the administration of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol significantly improved FVC, 191 air trapping, 192,193 dyspnea 193 and quality of life.…”
Section: Delivery Systems Targeting Small Airwayssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The mean penetration index (the ratio of peripheral to central lung deposition) with the k-haler was 0.31, demonstrating that FP and FORM were deposited in both central and peripheral regions of the lung (Figure 3(a-c)), suggesting that FP/FORM delivered by the k-haler effectively reaches small-caliber bronchi [48]. The 43.0% lung deposition, as a percentage of metered or nominal dose, of the FP/FORM k-haler compares well with that of other ICS/LABA inhalers in patients with asthma, with a higher deposition than that reported for the FP/SAL pMDI (14.7% of nominal dose) [52], beclometasone dipropionate [BDP]/FORM pMDI (30.9% of nominal dose) [53], and BDP/FORM NEXThaler ® (Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy) (40.3% of nominal dose) [54]. Thus, the promising in vitro characteristics seem to translate to high levels of lung deposition.…”
Section: In Vivo Lung Deposition Studymentioning
confidence: 55%
“… 69 Furthermore, clear differences in lung deposition were not observed when patients performed inhalation correctly. 68 For the main DPI devices, the published lung deposition rates from individual studies (without direct comparisons) are as follows: Accuhaler ® 7.6%, 70 Aerolizer ® 13%–20%, 34 , 71 Breezhaler ® 26.8%–39%, 24 , 29 Easyhaler ® 18.5%–31%, 71 , 72 Genuair ® 30.1%–51.1%, 27 , 73 , 74 Handihaler ® 9.8%–46.7%, 19 , 24 , 71 Ingelheim inhaler ® 16%–59%, 75 NEXThaler ® 39.4%–56%, 11 , 76 Spinhaler ® 11.5%, 75 Turbuhaler ® 14.2%–69.3%, 21 , 42 , 77–79 and Twisthaler ® 36%–37%. 80 Similarly to all inhaler devices, other factors are probably influencing the lung deposition rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%