Lung cancer patients in Queensland suffer delays in receiving radiation therapy – but not as a result of distance

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether lung cancer radiation therapy waiting times in Queensland public hospitals are associated with distance of residence from the nearest treatment facility. Methods: Retrospective analysis of radiation therapy waiting times of 1535Queensland residents who were diagnosed with lung cancer from 2000 to 2004 and received radiation therapy as initial treatment at a public hospital. The effect of distance of residence from treatment centre on median waiting time was analysed by quantile regression controlling for sex, age, lung cancer histology, stage and therapeutic intent.Results: The median waiting time from diagnosis to start of radiation therapy was 33 days for all patients. There was no significant difference (P = 0.141) in median waiting times in relation to distance of residence from a treatment centre. However, in most patients, waiting times were significantly longer than recommended by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Curative patients waited longer than palliative patients, while patients with earlier stage cancer waited longer than those with more advanced disease. Conclusion:Waiting times for radiation therapy among lung cancer patients in Queensland was not associated with distance from place of residence to the nearest public treatment facility. However, delays overall are excessive and are likely to worsen unless radiation treatment capabilities are enhanced to keep pace with population growth in Queensland.

Timeliness of lung cancer care in Victoria: a retrospective cohort study

“…Large cohort studies in Canada have identified waiting times of 42 days for curative radiotherapy and 39 days for surgery. Closer to home, the median overall waiting time from diagnosis to initiation of radiation therapy in Queensland was 33 days; this was not affected by distance to the treating hospital 19 . Median waiting times were longer for patients with early stage disease (stage I and II NSCLC; median, 48 days) than for those with more advanced disease (stages III and IV disease; median, 34 and 26 days respectively).…”

Patients with localized non‐small cell lung cancer miss out on curative surgery with distance from specialist care

“…We had no information on whether patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy as these are predominantly provided in outpatient cancer care centres. However, other studies have shown that, like surgery, there is lower use of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and combined treatment with increasing distance to specialist treatment and that their use varies depending on the specialty of the hospital or whether a centre with radiotherapy was the first attended . We also used a cancer registry‐based definition of localized stage (localized to the tissue or organ of origin); TNM definitions would have been preferable but were not available.…”

Volumetric modulated arc therapy is superior to conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy - a comparison among prostate cancer patients treated in an Australian centre

“…RA is just one VMAT technology now available. Australian centres have been plagued by skilled staff shortages and waiting lists [8,9]. VMAT can contribute to solving these problems as well as update our treatment complexity to the level expected of a developed country.…”