2016
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01633-2016
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease: balancing the risk of surgery and diagnostic uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important is biopsy, performed depending on the tissue involved. Lung biopsy can be useful to assess the ILD pattern with more precision, but the acquired information should be balanced with the risk of the procedure [2]. It should be taken into account that, although small studies have reported histological differences between the UIP pattern in RA and IPF (fewer fibroblastic foci and more CD4+ cells in RA), no evidences strongly support a confident differential diagnosis between these two conditions [135].…”
Section: Second-line Instrumental Examsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most important is biopsy, performed depending on the tissue involved. Lung biopsy can be useful to assess the ILD pattern with more precision, but the acquired information should be balanced with the risk of the procedure [2]. It should be taken into account that, although small studies have reported histological differences between the UIP pattern in RA and IPF (fewer fibroblastic foci and more CD4+ cells in RA), no evidences strongly support a confident differential diagnosis between these two conditions [135].…”
Section: Second-line Instrumental Examsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic assessment of patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) can be challenging, since this condition is associated with several possible diseases [1]. The utility of invasive exams should be also balanced, between the amount of histological information provided and the risk of side effects, mainly in elderly patients or in subjects with a severe disease [2]. Currently, the gold standard in the diagnosis and management of ILD is the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), in which physicians of several disciplines discuss doubtful cases to reach a confident diagnosis [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a UIP pattern was not clearly identified ("possible" or "inconsistent with UIP") by HRCT, confirmation of diagnosis via surgical lung biopsy (SLB) was recommended [14]. SLB is associated with an elevated risk of acute exacerbation, pneumothorax and mortality, and may therefore be inappropriate for some patients [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recently estimated that only 5% of clinically suspected IPFs were biopsied [8]. The risk of surgical lung biopsy, which low for patients younger than 65 years and with no significant comorbidity and preserved lung function who are referred for elective surgery, is higher in other situations [9,10], and a biopsy may be impracticable or risky. In addition, physicians often are reluctant to refer patients for lung biopsy even in the absence of any contraindication or comorbidity, and most patients would generally prefer not to undergo surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, this need to balance diagnostic uncertainty with the risk of biopsy [9] has generated some pressure to develop newer techniques (including genomics, genetics, biomarkers, and new imaging techniques) in order to move away from lung biopsy and also to assess the diagnostic accuracy of less invasive techniques of accessing lung tissue. Recently, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy has been shown to be a valuable tool for the pathological assessment of ILDs [11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%