“…37,38,53,80 For instance, some models permitted clarification of several important issues of the intracranial circulation, such as the intracranial pressure (ICP) response to pressure-volume tests, 34 the significance of ICP and transcranial Doppler pulsatility indices, 71,72 the origin of ICP waves, 60,69,74 the characteristics of cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation, 75 as well as the role of venous collapsibility. 12,68 Many models were focused specifically on fluidodynamics of the cerebral circulation, using 1D, 2D, or 3D partial derivative equations for the arterial blood flow, but almost completely neglecting the action of regulatory mechanisms, 2,7,8,10,11,18,42,54,80 or including blood flow regulation only in a simple form (for instance with a proportional-integral-derivative controller, such as done by Moorhead et al 50 ). These models are very useful to analyze mechanical aspects of the brain circulation (such as the mechanisms leading to aneurism rupture, the velocity profile in different arteries or pulse wave propagation in cerebral vessels) but are intrinsically unable to describe cerebral hemodynamics during transient maneuvers (such as hypercapnia, hypotension, and compression tests) which acutely activate control actions.…”