2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.085320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminescence fromβFeSi2precipitates in Si. II: Origin and nature of the photoluminescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
60
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter issue can be the reason why absorption measurements [4,5] showed the direct nature of the gap while our calculations suggest that the indirect transition should be lower by a few tenth of eV. A similar situation has been observed for β-FeSi 2 where the first direct and indirect transitions are close in energy [18]. In order to confirm our findings, optical measurements on high-quality samples of Ir 3 Si 5 should be performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The latter issue can be the reason why absorption measurements [4,5] showed the direct nature of the gap while our calculations suggest that the indirect transition should be lower by a few tenth of eV. A similar situation has been observed for β-FeSi 2 where the first direct and indirect transitions are close in energy [18]. In order to confirm our findings, optical measurements on high-quality samples of Ir 3 Si 5 should be performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The a-FeSi 2 is a metallic phase that is thermally stable above 937 8C, and b-FeSi 2 is a semiconducting silicide. The photoluminescence (PL) at 1.55 mm from semiconducting b-FeSi 2 has attracted interest for silicon-based optoelectronic applications [1] and has been reported in various reports [2][3][4]. Moreover, its high optical absorption coefficient (higher than 10 5 cm À1 above 1.0 eV) can be advantage of using in photovoltaic devices [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11,42 The difference between direct and indirect band gap energies is 11 meV for the average of our ␤-FeSi 2 nanoparticles. Christensen 7 reported in a theoretical calculation ͑for a defect-free system/fully relaxed͒ an energy difference of approximately 35 meV ͑at T=0 K͒ between the indirect gap and the first direct transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…8,9 From this point of view, the study of the formation of isolated nanoparticles will be of interest to explore that prediction and additionally to complement low-dimensional structure knowledge for optoelectronic applications. Previous experiments by Grimaldi et al 10 and Martinelli et al 11 showed that elastically strained ball-shaped particles ͑formed by ion-beam synthesis͒ surrounded by a defect-free matrix do not have luminescence properties, whereas unstrained disk-shaped particles in a matrix with a large number of defects emit around 0.805 eV. Absorbance measurements of the latter have suggested the existence of a direct band gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%