2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminescence age constraints on the Pleistocene-Holocene transition recorded in loess sequences across SE Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top part of the profile that encompasses the Pleistocene/Holocene transition (L1/S0 unit) is characterized by increasing ages with profile depth, ranging from 5.3 ± 0.5 ka to 22.8 ± 2.3 ka for fine (4-11 µm) quartz and from 5.3 ± 0.7 ka to 35.9 ± 3.2 ka for coarse (63-90 µm) quartz (Figure 8b). In the Holocene soil, for ages up to about 11 ka OSL ages obtained for coarse and fine quartz agree, as expected and previously reported for such young samples [27]. The older samples taken from the L1/S0 transition and the L1 loess unit yielded ages that no longer agree within uncertainties.…”
Section: Ages and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The top part of the profile that encompasses the Pleistocene/Holocene transition (L1/S0 unit) is characterized by increasing ages with profile depth, ranging from 5.3 ± 0.5 ka to 22.8 ± 2.3 ka for fine (4-11 µm) quartz and from 5.3 ± 0.7 ka to 35.9 ± 3.2 ka for coarse (63-90 µm) quartz (Figure 8b). In the Holocene soil, for ages up to about 11 ka OSL ages obtained for coarse and fine quartz agree, as expected and previously reported for such young samples [27]. The older samples taken from the L1/S0 transition and the L1 loess unit yielded ages that no longer agree within uncertainties.…”
Section: Ages and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our pIRIR 290 residual results are consistent with those obtained by Constantin et al . () for loess samples from Mošorin (Vojvodina, Serbia) and Veres et al . () for Stayky LPS, Ukraine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In ad di tion, Constantin et al (2019) have just pub lished new OSL ages for the up per most loess R-L1L1 (L1 ac cord ing to the no men cla ture of Constantin et al, 2019): 16.6 ±1.1 ka at 0.87 m depth and 21 ±1.4 ka at 1.37 m depth. These au thors concluded that the loess was de pos ited dur ing the Last Gla cial Max i mum.…”
Section: Contradictory Stratigraphic Positions Of the Mbbmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, the Dnipro stage, rep re sented by ex tremely well de vel oped loess units in the Roksolany and Vyazivok sec tions, is cor re lated with MIS 6. OSL dat ing re sults af ter Fedorowicz et al (2012Fedorowicz et al ( , 2013 and Constantin et al (2019) from the up per loess lay ers at Roksolany sup port our in ter pre ta tion and are con sis tent with sim i lar lu mi nes cence ages of L1 and L2 loess ob tained in the Kurortne sec tion (Tecsa et al, 2020), 25 km south of Roksolany, and the near est Ro ma nian, Bul gar ian and Ser bian se quences (see Necula et al, 2015, Constantin et al, 2019, Lomax et al, 2019. The Roksolany Tephra layer in the up per most part of R-L2 po ten tially can be cor re lated with, wide spread in the Dan ube -Black Sea loess-palaeosol se quences, the "L2 Tephra" (Fig.…”
Section: Chronostratigraphic Revisions Of the Roksolany Sectionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation