1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminal loss and site of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26] When stent restenosis occurs, the stenotic process usually involves the stent itself or its adjacent margins 27 and neointimal hyperplasia has been indicated as the cause of in-stent restenosis; 28,29 however, the cause of para-stent restenosis is still unknown. Based on the present results, stent implantation might change the segmental movement pattern and an iatrogenic critical movement may develop in the para-stent area resulting in development of a new lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] When stent restenosis occurs, the stenotic process usually involves the stent itself or its adjacent margins 27 and neointimal hyperplasia has been indicated as the cause of in-stent restenosis; 28,29 however, the cause of para-stent restenosis is still unknown. Based on the present results, stent implantation might change the segmental movement pattern and an iatrogenic critical movement may develop in the para-stent area resulting in development of a new lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these shortcomings, flexible second-generation stents were developed and are available in a variety of lengths. The GFX stent is structurally uniform through the entire length without articulation, which theoretically should decrease the potential risk of restenosis caused by stent-to-stent overlap, interstent gaps, and articulation [16]. Recent trials comparing some of the second-generation stents with first-generation devices have shown at least equivalent performance in highly selected patients with relatively simple lesions [17,18], but it is uncertain whether the benefits of stent implantation would also be applicable to longer stenosis.…”
Section: Discussion Single Long-stent Implantation With a Second-genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the Palmaz-Schatz stent incorporating a spiral bridge was used. It has been shown that when using the PalmazSchatz stent composed of two rigid 7-mm slotted tubes connected by a 1-mm central bridging strut, the largest amount of neointimal formation was located at the articulation site [33] . However, this needs to be investigated further since a recent study found that the largest lumen loss was located in the midportion of the stent regardless of stent type [10] .…”
Section: Clinical and Angiographic Outcome At 6 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%