2020
DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumican promotes joint fibrosis through TGF‐β signaling

Abstract: Proposed mechanisms for lumican in joint contracture include: (a) increased lumican with posttraumatic damage that has caused a transition from a normal joint capsule to joint contracture; and (b) stimulating synovial fibroblasts with recombinant lumican leads to increased transcription of alpha‐smooth muscle actin, matrix metallopeptidase 9, Collagen I, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and transforming growth factor‐β in vitro, possibly through the transforming growth factor‐β pathway. Thus, lumican may affe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 , 13 Moreover, lumican was found to be one of the most regulated proteins in HCM, and studies in non‐cardiac tissues indicate a role for lumican in development of fibrosis. 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 Despite this, lumican has not yet been examined in HCM in detail at the molecular level. Therefore, we have studied the production and localization of lumican in myectomy samples from patients with HOCM, hearts from the well‐established Myh6 R403Q mouse model of HCM and human foetal cardiac fibroblasts (hfCFBs) treated with lumican, with special focus on relationship to collagen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 12 , 13 Moreover, lumican was found to be one of the most regulated proteins in HCM, and studies in non‐cardiac tissues indicate a role for lumican in development of fibrosis. 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 Despite this, lumican has not yet been examined in HCM in detail at the molecular level. Therefore, we have studied the production and localization of lumican in myectomy samples from patients with HOCM, hearts from the well‐established Myh6 R403Q mouse model of HCM and human foetal cardiac fibroblasts (hfCFBs) treated with lumican, with special focus on relationship to collagen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLRP lumican, specifically, is increased in patients with heart failure 10,11 and is shown to be important for heart failure progression and survival during studies of lumican knockout mice 12,13 . Moreover, lumican was found to be one of the most regulated proteins in HCM, and studies in non‐cardiac tissues indicate a role for lumican in development of fibrosis 11,14–16 . Despite this, lumican has not yet been examined in HCM in detail at the molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, biglycan deficiency could also accelerate the IDD process [ 31 ], implying its pleiotropic role in homeostasis and the degenerative process. Lumican facilitates collagen fibril fusion and may accelerate joint fibrosis through TGF-β activation in joint synovial fibroblast [ 32 ]. Increase in fibronectin and its fragments has been linked to IDD and its fibrotic-like events [ 21 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Matrices In Np Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are few in vitro options that are suitable to study myofibroblastogenesis, and these utilize fibroblasts derived from unknown sources, 16,17 cells from human tissues not associated with the local knee environment, 18 knee fibroblasts isolated from animals, 19 or primary cells isolated from the human knee environment with only partial phenotypic characterization. [20][21][22][23][24] Therefore, a well-characterized cell culture model for in vitro myofibroblastogenesis based on primary cultures of knee fibroblasts is essential for controlled experimentation to investigate arthrofibrotic processes at cellular, molecular, and biochemical levels. Such a model would aid in the definition of fibrosis associated pathways unique to the knee tissue, the identification of potential diagnostic markers, and the development of therapeutic options for future in vivo animal and human studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in vivo models of arthrofibrosis are costly, and the ability to control specific regulatory molecular pathways that contribute to the disease process is limited. To date, there are few in vitro options that are suitable to study myofibroblastogenesis, and these utilize fibroblasts derived from unknown sources, 16,17 cells from human tissues not associated with the local knee environment, 18 knee fibroblasts isolated from animals, 19 or primary cells isolated from the human knee environment with only partial phenotypic characterization 20–24 . Therefore, a well‐characterized cell culture model for in vitro myofibroblastogenesis based on primary cultures of knee fibroblasts is essential for controlled experimentation to investigate arthrofibrotic processes at cellular, molecular, and biochemical levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%