Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion Using a Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Patients with Multilevel Severe Degenerative Lumbosacral Spondylosis: Technical Note and Case Presentations

Jung, Seok Bong; Kim, Nackhwan

doi:10.1055/a-1783-9999

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Compared with single-portal endoscopy, biportal endoscopy is slightly more disruptive to the spinal anatomy but is more efficient in decompression. Therefore, many clinicians use this technique for multilevel spinal decompression and fusion (58)(59)(60).…”

Section: Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeWe aimed to comprehensively analyze the current status, hotspots, and trends in full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) research using bibliometric analysis and knowledge domain mapping.MethodsThe Web of Science database was used to screen FESS-related articles published between January 1, 1993 and June 10, 2022. The evaluation involved the following criteria: total number of articles; H-index; and contributions from countries/regions, institutions, journals, and authors.ResultsA total of 1,064 articles were included. Since 2016, there have been a significant number of publications in the field of FESS. The country/region contributing the largest number of articles was China (37.8%), followed by South Korea (24%), the United States (16.1%), Japan (5.7%), and Germany (5.1%). South Korea (35) had the highest H-index, followed by the United States (27), China (22), Japan (21), and Germany (20). World Neurosurgery (15.7%) published the largest number of FESS-related articles. However, among the top 10 most cited articles, six were published in Spine. The author who contributed the most was S.H. Lee (5.4%), and the largest number of contributions in this field originated from Wooridul Spine Hospital (South Korea; 6.1%). Notably, six of the 10 most published authors in this field were from South Korea. Of the top five productive institutions, three were from South Korea. The keywords with the strongest citation bursts in the field of FESS were “lumbar spine,” “discectomy,” “interlaminar,” “surgical technique,” “follow-up,” “excision,” “thoracic spine,” and “endoscopic surgery.” The 10 clusters generated in this study were: “endoscopic discectomy” (#0), “thoracic myelopathy” (#1), “recurrent lumbar disc herniation” (#2), “low back pain” (#3), “cervical vertebrae” (#4), “lumbar spinal stenosis” (#5), “transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion” (#6), “radiation exposure” (#7), “management” (#8), and “lumbar spine” (#9).ConclusionGlobal research on FESS is mostly concentrated in a few countries/regions and authors. South Korea has made the largest contribution to the field of FESS. Based on the most cited keyword bursts and clusters, the focus of FESS research was found to include its indications, management, and applications.

show abstract

Section: Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Method of Portal Making in Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery with Different Operative Approaches According to the Constant Anatomical Landmarks of the Lumbar Spine: A Review of the Literature

Wang,

Maimaiti,

Tuoheti

et al. 2024

Global Spine Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study Design Review. Objective Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive surgery that is gaining recognition and being employed in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the precise method for determining UBE portals’ location varies depending on the originator’s preferences or the anatomical structure’s proximity to the portal positions. Consequently, the relationship among UBE portals' locations is messy. This study aims to elaborate on the specific portal localization and explore the positional association and commonality among different UBE approaches’ portals. Methods The following keywords are used to search in the PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang database: “Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery”, “Two portal endoscopic spinal surgery”, “Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression”, “Unilateral biportal endoscopy”, “Irrigation endoscopic discectomy”, “UBE” and “BESS”. Results After screening, 29 pieces of literature are included. The study summarizes different UBE approach portal localizations, categorized by fusion or non-fusion surgery and pathological classification. The study presents an inaugural method for categorizing the lumber into four surgical intervals based on bone landmarks and assigns different UBE approaches to the appropriate intervals based on their characteristics, making the selection of UBE surgical approaches’ portal locations more flexible. Additionally, the study provides an overview of the indications, complications, and distinct benefits associated with each interval, further refining the novel UBE portal interval localization method. Conclusion The study clarifies the interrelationship and commonality between the portals of different UBE approaches and proposes a new UBE portal interval localization method to enhance surgeons’ understanding and proficiency in UBE procedures.

show abstract

Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion Using a Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Patients with Multilevel Severe Degenerative Lumbosacral Spondylosis: Technical Note and Case Presentations

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis

Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis

The Method of Portal Making in Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery with Different Operative Approaches According to the Constant Anatomical Landmarks of the Lumbar Spine: A Review of the Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About