Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients’ Use of an Internet Support Group: Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

Background Internet use within health care contexts offers the possibility to provide both health information and peer support. Internet Support Groups (ISGs) for patients may offer advantages, which are not found in face-to-face support. In patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion (LSF), ISGs could have a particular potential, as peer support on the web might bridge the decreased satisfaction with social life and social isolation found within these patients. ISGs might in this way contribute to increasing the functioning and overall health-related quality of life. However, LSF patients may generally belong to a group of citizens not prone to internet and online peer support. However, our knowledge of how LSF patients use ISGs is limited. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of users of an ISG and thematically explore the content of ISG interactions in Danish patients undergoing instrumented LSF because of degenerative spine disorders. Methods Participants were recruited from a randomized controlled trial and included in a prospective cohort with a mixed methods design. Sociodemographic characteristics and information on psychological well-being (symptoms of anxiety and depression) were obtained at baseline and 1 to 5 weeks before surgery. Usage of the ISG was registered from baseline until 3 months after surgery. All posts and comments were collected, and content analysis was performed. Results A total of 48 participants comprised the study population, with a mean age of 53 years (range 29-77). Of the participants, 54% (26/48) were female, 85% (41/48) were cohabitating, 69% (33/48) were unemployed, and the majority (69% [33/48]) had secondary education. Approximately one-third of the participants had symptoms of depression (35%, 17/48) and anxiety (29%, 14/48). Overall, 90% (43/48) of the participants accessed the ISG. No correlations were found between sociodemographic characteristics and access to the ISG. Women were more prone to be active users, contributing with posts ( P =.04). Finally, active users contributing with posts or comments had viewed more pages, whereas passive users, users without posts or comments, had more interactions with the ISG ( P <.001). The ISG contained 180 conversation threads, generating 354 comments. The 180 conversation threads in the ISG were constituted by 671 independent dialogue sequences. On the basis of those 671 dialogue sequences, 7 thematic categories emerged. Conclusions Sociodemographic characteristics were not predictors of ISG use in this study, and active use was found to be gender dependent. Content of interactions on the ISG emerged within 7 thematic categories and focused on social recognition, experience of pain or use of pain medication, experience of physical activity or physical rehabilitation, expression of psychosocial well-being, advising on a...

Online Peer Support Groups for Behavior Change: Moderation Requirements

“…Previous research into gender would suggest the males and females make different use of social support networks to manage behaviour change [14]; including within internet support groups [15]. This was not found to be the case in this study, as gender was not a significant predictor in any of the significant regression models.…”

Systematic review of telemedicine in spine surgery

“…In a subsequent subanalysis of patients who used the online tool, Strøm et al tried to identify sociodemographic or clinical characteristics predicting increased activity in the online support group. 20 The authors found that female patients were significantly more likely to engage with the online tool. Further, patients' posts fell into 7 distinct thematic categories (e.g., activity/rehabilitation, postoperative pain, employment).…”

“…19 One study evaluated patient participation in an online support group for patients undergoing lumbar fusion. 20 Finally, one study assessed a wearable accelerometer device to measure physical activity in relation to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). 21 Studies with a comparator arm included analyses for the efficacy of the TM intervention relative to the control group, including patient compliance with the TM intervention, preference, and impact on target outcomes (Tables 2 and 3).…”

Support Group as a Management Modality for Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Randomized Prospective Study

“…Support groups serve an important function in patients affected by a disease, especially a rare disease [35]. Positive effects have been reported in patients with Wilson disease [35], vitiligo [36], lumbar spine fusion [37], and cancer [38][39][40][41]. To the best of our knowledge, no opposing evidence has been reported.…”