1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90048-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumbar spinal stenosis: A review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
123
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
123
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the degree of constriction of the spinal canal considered to be symptomatic for LSS is not clear, the diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques, findings from clinical examination and appropriate outcome measures need to be identified to ensure careful patient and treatment selection for successful and lasting results. These questions warrant attention to improve the management of patients with LSS [9,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the degree of constriction of the spinal canal considered to be symptomatic for LSS is not clear, the diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques, findings from clinical examination and appropriate outcome measures need to be identified to ensure careful patient and treatment selection for successful and lasting results. These questions warrant attention to improve the management of patients with LSS [9,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessing individuals with LSS are reported to be higher than those of competing methods, with MR imaging outperforming computed tomography and myelography [9]. Measurements of the cross-sectional area of the dural sac are considered more effective in diagnosing central stenosis than measurements of the osseous spinal canal [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etiologies of disability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis are multifactorial, and include mechanical factors such as spinal instability, neurological compromise, chemical factors, and other factors such as discogenic pain, facet arthropathy, and myofascial pain from ligaments or paraspinal muscles, etc. [8]. Therefore, it is very important for us to detect the critical factors affecting disability or physical functioning in degenerative spondylolisthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etiologies of disability are multifactorial in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; the leading factors responsible for disability are spinal instability and neurological compromise [8]. Other pathological factors associated with disabilities in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis include chemical factors such as inflammation, discogenic pain, facet arthropathy, and myofascial pain from ligaments or paraspinal muscles [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation