2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumbar puncture needle length determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe our formula more accurately predicted the SCD length than the formula of Abe et al, 10 because the BMI in the cohort of 50 patients from which we derived our formula is more reflective of the adult US population. The patient population in the Abe et al study had a BMI of 22.6 (BMIC, normal) and included children and adults, while the BMI in our cohort of adult patients was 31.7 (BMIC, obese), which is more similar to the average BMI of 28.4 (BMIC, overweight) seen in the adult US population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We believe our formula more accurately predicted the SCD length than the formula of Abe et al, 10 because the BMI in the cohort of 50 patients from which we derived our formula is more reflective of the adult US population. The patient population in the Abe et al study had a BMI of 22.6 (BMIC, normal) and included children and adults, while the BMI in our cohort of adult patients was 31.7 (BMIC, obese), which is more similar to the average BMI of 28.4 (BMIC, overweight) seen in the adult US population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Our formula would have predicted the correct needle length in 14/15 (93%) female patients and selection of a needle that was too long (5 versus 3.5 inch) in 1 patient; while in men, our formula predicted the correct needle in 25/30 (83%) patients and selection of a needle that was too long (5 versus 3.5 inch) in 5 male patients. There have been studies that have derived formulas to estimate SCD for interspinous approach LPs, including the formulas by Abe et al, 10 Ma et al, 11 Stoker and Bonsu, 12 , and Chong et al, 13 which are often cited in the literature. The SCD that all 4 formulas predicted were significantly different from the actual SCD (all, P Ͻ .001) measured in our cohort of 45 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many factors associated with neuraxial anaesthesia have been studied including the structures at the level of the termination of the spinal cord and dural sac [11], vertebral level and shape of the conus medullaris [12], shape of the epidural space [13][14][15], and distance from the skin to the epidural or subarachnoid spaces [16][17][18][19]. However, the effect of body position relevant to neuraxial blockade has not been well studied [20][21][22][23][24], especially in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCD has also been estimated retrospectively by measuring image datasets from patients who had undergone abdominal CT 10. However, fewer than 10 of these patients were infants and, additionally, the patients were lying supine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%