1982
DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198204000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumbar Monoradiculopathy Due to Unilateral Facet Hypertrophy

Abstract: Twenty-two patients presented during the last 3 years with unilateral symptoms and signs of a lumbar monoradiculopathy indistinguishable from those of a disc herniation. All had compression of the nerve root posteriorly by a hypertrophic facet without anterior compression from the disc. None of the patients had spinal claudication. Preoperative evaluation with computed tomographic (CT) scanning was disappointing as the pathology was correctly defined in only 1 of 10 patients. Lumbar myelography was helpful, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In cases of central canal stenosis, the pain may be bilateral, although not necessarily symmetric; in cases in which the lateral recess is the most prominent site of nerve root entrapment, symptoms may resemble a unilateral monoradiculopathy. 13,[24][25][26] Sensory and motor dysfunction, often in the same anatomic distribution as the radicular pain, may also be present.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 In cases of central canal stenosis, the pain may be bilateral, although not necessarily symmetric; in cases in which the lateral recess is the most prominent site of nerve root entrapment, symptoms may resemble a unilateral monoradiculopathy. 13,[24][25][26] Sensory and motor dysfunction, often in the same anatomic distribution as the radicular pain, may also be present.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common causes of back pain with radiculopathy are a herniated intervertebral disc in patients under 55 years of age and lumbosacral spondylosis with or without spinal stenosis in older patients (Table 2). 50, 68, 97, 98, 131…”
Section: Etiology and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%