Lumbar lateral shift in a patient with interspinous device implantation: a case report

Peterson, Seth; Hodges, Cheri

doi:10.1179/2042618615y.0000000019

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(28 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 16 case reports or series describing 143 patients after lumbar laminectomy. Two reports from the medical profession [42,63], 1 from physical therapy [60], 1 from an athletic trainer [45] and the rest were chiropractic specific. Favorable responses were described with spinal manipulation [42, 44, 48-50, 57, 64, 65], spinal manipulation under anesthesia [35], spinal mobilization with or without McKenzie method [60], FD manipulation [38,41,51,66], and massage [45].…”

Section: Laminectomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulative and manual therapies in the management of patients with prior lumbar surgery: A systematic review

Daniels

Cupler

Gliedt

et al. 2021

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The purpose was to identify, summarize, and rate scholarly literature that describes manipulative and manual therapy following lumbar surgery. Methods The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered with PROSPERO. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ICL, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched through July 2019. Articles were screened independently by at least two reviewers for inclusion. Articles included described the practice, utilization, and/or clinical decision making to post surgical intervention with manipulative and/or manual therapies. Data extraction consisted of principal findings, pain and function/disability, patient satisfaction, opioid/medication consumption, and adverse events. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network critical appraisal checklists were utilized to assess study quality. Results Literature search yielded 1916 articles, 348 duplicates were removed, 109 full-text articles were screened and 50 citations met inclusion criteria. There were 37 case reports/case series, 3 randomized controlled trials, 3 pilot studies, 5 systematic/scoping/narrative reviews, and 2 commentaries. Conclusion The findings of this review may help inform practitioners who utilize manipulative and/or manual therapies regarding levels of evidence for patients with prior lumbar surgery. Following lumbar surgery, the evidence indicated inpatient neural mobilization does not improve outcomes. There is inconclusive evidence to recommend for or against most manual therapies after most surgical interventions.

show abstract

Section: Laminectomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulative and manual therapies in the management of patients with prior lumbar surgery: A systematic review

Daniels

Cupler

Gliedt

et al. 2021

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MDT allows for the treatment to adapt as patient presentation changes. MDT also follows referral patterns and symptomatic and mechanical responses to repeated movements to confirm findings in a safe and more reliable manner [10][11][12][13][32][33][34]. Without an initial MDT evaluation prior to surgery, it is difficult to say if the appropriate level received the surgical intervention with only MRI results dictating treatment.…”

Section: Orthopedics and Rheumatology Open Access Journalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

OROAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of neck pain is estimated to be 30-50 % in the general population, the second leading source of reported pain in the United States. There is limited research on the use of mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) on patients with cervical pain. The effects and safety of MDT assessment and treatment for failed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has yet to be established. This case report presents a 42-year-old female with a complaint of worsening neck pain with intermittent radiculopathy after an ACDF to address cervical radiculopathy. The patient received a MDT evaluation and was classified as a thoracic spine derangement. The patient was treated based on mechanical and symptomatic responses to repeated movements and mobilizations using principles of MDT. Short-and long-term outcomes were excellent, demonstrating rapid abolishment of symptoms and improvement of function in 6 visits over 4 weeks. The patient reported no pain or functional disability and had returned to all work and recreational activities. The patient demonstrated the ability to prevent and manage recurrence of symptoms independently at one-year follow-up. This case report confirms the efficacy and safety of MDT evaluation after a failed ACDF. The patient was successfully managed using MDT with full resolution of symptoms. This case report provides preliminary evidence that MDT may provide effective short-and long-term outcomes after failed ACDF. Less invasive, conservative methods, such as MDT, may be more effective at resolving cervical radiculopathy. Level of evidence 4.

show abstract

The why, where, and how clinical reasoning model for the evaluation and treatment of patients with low back pain

Riley

Swanson

Cleland

2021

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lumbar lateral shift in a patient with interspinous device implantation: a case report

Cited by 5 publications

References 34 publications

Manipulative and manual therapies in the management of patients with prior lumbar surgery: A systematic review

Manipulative and manual therapies in the management of patients with prior lumbar surgery: A systematic review

Untitled

The why, where, and how clinical reasoning model for the evaluation and treatment of patients with low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About