2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lumbar Disc Localization and Labeling with a Probabilistic Model on Both Pixel and Object Features

Abstract: Repeatable, quantitative assessment of intervertebral disc pathology requires accurate localization and labeling of the lumbar region discs. To that end, we propose a two-level probabilistic model for such disc localization and labeling. Our model integrates both pixel-level information, such as appearance, and object-level information, such as relative location. Utilizing both levels of information adds robustness to the ambiguous disc intensity signature and high structure variation. Yet, we are able to do e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3,6,8,9] the authors add prior information via graphical models, such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [10], and infer the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimate for the vertebrae locations. In contrast, [11,12] use a fully generative model, and inference is achieved via generalized expectation-maximization, while in [7] deformable templates are used for segmentation and subsequent identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [3,6,8,9] the authors add prior information via graphical models, such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [10], and infer the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimate for the vertebrae locations. In contrast, [11,12] use a fully generative model, and inference is achieved via generalized expectation-maximization, while in [7] deformable templates are used for segmentation and subsequent identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They either focus on a specific region, such as lumbar or thoracic, or need to modify their models based on the expected spine region. In [11,12] approximate alignment between scans is assumed. To the best of our knowledge the only work that explicitly handles arbitrary scans is [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disc-labels make it plausible to separate the disc variables from the image intensities, i.e., the disc-label L variables capture the local pixel-level intensity models while the disc variables D capture the high-level geometric and contextual models of the full set of discs. The optimization is solved with a generalized expectation minimization (gEM) algorithm [15,16]. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section explains each step: Disc Localization: The system automatically locates the middle sagittal slice from the MRI volume by index. Then our automatic method starts by a localization step that provides a point inside each disc using the two-level probabilistic model proposed by Corso et al [15,16]. Their model labels the set of discs with high level labels…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corso et al [2] argue that a two-level probabilistic model is required to separate pixel-level properties from object-level geometric and contextual properties. They propose a generative graphical model with latent disk variables which they solve by generalized expectation maximization (EM).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%