2022
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ludvig Dahl's psychiatric genetic studies in his 1859 monograph: “Contribution to the knowledge of insanity in Norway”

Abstract: In 1859, Ludvig Dahl, a Norwegian alienist, wrote a rarely referenced book entitled "Contribution to The Knowledge of Insanity." In it, he describes a highly innovative psychiatric genetics research project with severable notable features. First, while the vast majority of 19th century psychiatric genetic studies were based on asylum hospital records, Dahl did field work to find cases of mental illness in certain defined areas within Norway, using census data, key-informants, record reviews, and personal inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, these papers instantiated a major methodological shift in psychiatric genetics. Most psychiatric genetic studies of the 19th century, with some important exceptions (e.g., Dahl, 1859; Kendler et al, 2022) and by Doutrebente (1869), focused on aggregate hereditary burden and did not report the disease status of individual relatives at a particular place in the pedigree. This point is best demonstrated by a paper published by Wolfsohn in 1907, only 5 years prior to the report by Schuppius, which studied genetic risk for Kraepelin's new diagnostic category of DP but used aggregate measures of hereditary burden and did not, in the entire detailed report, consider individual relatives or pedigrees (Wolfsohn, 1907).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, these papers instantiated a major methodological shift in psychiatric genetics. Most psychiatric genetic studies of the 19th century, with some important exceptions (e.g., Dahl, 1859; Kendler et al, 2022) and by Doutrebente (1869), focused on aggregate hereditary burden and did not report the disease status of individual relatives at a particular place in the pedigree. This point is best demonstrated by a paper published by Wolfsohn in 1907, only 5 years prior to the report by Schuppius, which studied genetic risk for Kraepelin's new diagnostic category of DP but used aggregate measures of hereditary burden and did not, in the entire detailed report, consider individual relatives or pedigrees (Wolfsohn, 1907).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the approach advocated by the Rüdin school of focusing on one class of relatives at a time, these investigators, working in clinical positions and lacking the resources of a research institute, studied pedigrees of probands ascertained through the asylums at which they worked. The first study of large pedigrees focusing on psychiatric illness was performed in rural Norway by Ludvig Dahl in 1859 (Dahl, 1859; Kendler et al, 2022), followed by Doutrebente in France in 1869 (Doutrebente, 1869). As outlined by Gausemeier (2015), pedigree studies became particularly popular at the end of the 19th century in Germany, in part as a result of the publication of Ottokar Lorenz's “Handbook of Scientific Genealogy” in 1898 (Lorenz, 1898).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%