2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3676-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luciferase Reporter Gene System to Detect Cell Wall Stress Stimulon Induction in Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Luciferase reporter gene fusions provide an extremely rapid and sensitive tool for measuring the induction or repression of stress responses in bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus activates the expression of a cell wall stress stimulon (CWSS) in response to the inhibition or disruption of cell wall synthesis. The highly sensitive promoter-reporter gene fusion construct psas016 p-luc+ can be used to quantify and compare any changes in CWSS expression levels and induction kinetics. Potential uses of this system incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that increased c-di-AMP levels can lead to cell wall thickness increase and beta-lactam resistance through activation of the CWSS and tested this hypothesis using the ΔgdpP mutant. CWSS basal expression was assessed in the absence of antibiotic-induced stress by quantifying the activity of the sas016 gene promoter, widely used as a proxy for CWSS activation (11,24,25). Confirming our hypothesis, the CWSS activity was increased in the ∆gdpP mutant (up to 4.5 times) as compared to the WT (Figure 5A).…”
Section: High C-di-amp Levels Increase the Activation Of The Cell Wal...supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hypothesized that increased c-di-AMP levels can lead to cell wall thickness increase and beta-lactam resistance through activation of the CWSS and tested this hypothesis using the ΔgdpP mutant. CWSS basal expression was assessed in the absence of antibiotic-induced stress by quantifying the activity of the sas016 gene promoter, widely used as a proxy for CWSS activation (11,24,25). Confirming our hypothesis, the CWSS activity was increased in the ∆gdpP mutant (up to 4.5 times) as compared to the WT (Figure 5A).…”
Section: High C-di-amp Levels Increase the Activation Of The Cell Wal...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The manipulated regions were checked by Sanger sequencing. The sas016 promoter luciferase fusion plasmid psas016 p -luc (24)was transduced into LAC* WT, ΔgdpP and ΔgdpP/ΔvraR mutant background using phage 80α.…”
Section: Plasmid Transduction and Genetic Manipulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that increased c-di-AMP levels can lead to cell wall thickness increase and beta-lactam resistance through the activation of the CWSS and tested this hypothesis using the Δ gdpP mutant as an example for a strain with increased c-di-AMP levels. CWSS basal expression was assessed in the absence of antibiotic-induced stress by quantifying the activity of the sas016 gene promoter, widely used as a proxy for CWSS activation ( 17 , 29 , 30 ). Confirming our hypothesis, the CWSS activity was significantly increased in the ∆ gdpP mutant compared to the WT ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manipulated regions were checked by Sanger sequencing. The sas016 promoter luciferase fusion plasmid p sas016 p - luc ( 29 ) was transduced into LAC* WT, Δ gdpP , and Δ gdpP/ Δ vraR mutant background using phage 80α.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, reporter gene approaches for antibiotic mode of action analysis are most common in the standard Gram-positive and Gram-negative model organisms Bacillus subtilis and E. coli (Table 2) (Bianchi, 1999;Hutter et al, 2004a;Urban et al, 2007;Wenzel et al, 2014). However, reporter gene studies in general are common tools in many organisms, including pathogens like S. aureus, and also strains that were not developed as antibiotic mode of action analysis tool can prove useful as such (Mesak et al, 2008;Chanda et al, 2009;Mondal et al, 2010;Dengler and McCallum, 2016;Bojer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Reporter Gene Fusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%