2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2010-01317-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lubrication by molecularly thin water films confined between nanostructured membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that such observations are just a coincidence: Should hydrophilic surfaces be manufactured with high density of adsorption sites close enough to each other to allow water molecules to easily migrate from one to the next, such hydrophilic surfaces could show liquid slip. Our interpretation is consistent with a recent simulation study for the thermal diffusion of carbon nanotube membranes (21), with the molecular mechanism proposed for liquid slip (22), and with experimental observations reported for alkanes (23). Our interpretation could also explain the experimental results by McCarthy and coworkers (24), according to which the contact angle hysteresis, and not the static contact angle, should be used, macroscopically, to determine the hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic character of a surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results suggest that such observations are just a coincidence: Should hydrophilic surfaces be manufactured with high density of adsorption sites close enough to each other to allow water molecules to easily migrate from one to the next, such hydrophilic surfaces could show liquid slip. Our interpretation is consistent with a recent simulation study for the thermal diffusion of carbon nanotube membranes (21), with the molecular mechanism proposed for liquid slip (22), and with experimental observations reported for alkanes (23). Our interpretation could also explain the experimental results by McCarthy and coworkers (24), according to which the contact angle hysteresis, and not the static contact angle, should be used, macroscopically, to determine the hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic character of a surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…105 The absence of inter-layer hydrogen bonds evidently imparts significant additional translational and rotational freedom to the molecules in this phase compared to the multilayer phase, but is countered by the severe geometric restrictions to relative motion imposed by confinement within such a narrow gap. The diffusivities of monolayers of TIP5P water between cristobalite walls reported by Zangi (D ≈ 4×10 −5 cm 2 /s), 85 and TIP3P water between (6,6) carbon nanotube membranes reported by Kalra et al 108 (D ≈ 2×10 −5 cm 2 /s), are approximately 2-5 times greater than the values calculated in this work, illustrat-ing the sensitivity of these results to the precise details of the system, and geometry of the gap. 34…”
Section: Monolayer Liquidmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In addition, the hydrophobic effect is crucial to understanding the nature of surface friction in nanoscale fluid transport. [19][20][21][22][23][24] Surface friction characterizes the boundary condition in the continuum description for fluid flow across interfaces of varying hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if the coordinate system is defined such that one direction is parallel and two directions are perpendicular to the line of centers. The two spheres are identical so by symmetry ζ 11 (r) = ζ 22 (r) and ζ 12 (r) = ζ 21 (r). The friction coefficient along the relative coordinate, r = r 2, − r 1, , may be obtained from manipulation of Eqn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%