2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-021-01430-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lubricant Effects on Articular Cartilage Sliding Biomechanics Under Physiological Fluid Load Support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors also previously agreed that loading of a cartilage pin against a glass plate drives unmitigated IFP loss during motion, leading to increased friction. 5,18 Interestingly, the opposite finding was observed in our tests with the severely degenerated group. Here, reduced friction might be attributable to an increased fluid exudation-aided lubrication between the cartilage pin and the glass surface.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors also previously agreed that loading of a cartilage pin against a glass plate drives unmitigated IFP loss during motion, leading to increased friction. 5,18 Interestingly, the opposite finding was observed in our tests with the severely degenerated group. Here, reduced friction might be attributable to an increased fluid exudation-aided lubrication between the cartilage pin and the glass surface.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In our C/G tribosystem, we found an increase of friction over time for the mildly degenerated samples, because the CoF at the end of the test ( µ end ) was higher than at the beginning ( µ 0 ). Other authors also previously agreed that loading of a cartilage pin against a glass plate drives unmitigated IFP loss during motion, leading to increased friction 5,18 . Interestingly, the opposite finding was observed in our tests with the severely degenerated group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…4,39 However, the current state of research applies a reductionist approach to discern between three modes of MCA, cSCA, and SCA tribological rehydration. 14,100 Studies using a hard impermeable counterface (i.e., glass, PEEK) show that during sustained sliding MCA and cSCA cartilage conditions, friction can remain consistently as low as μ ∼ 0.03 as a result of maintaining low cartilage strain and high interstitial fluid pressurization (eq 1). 39,40 MCA cartilage on glass exhibits low CoF values of 0.01−0.07 between speed ranges of 0.05 and 4.5 mm/s, maintaining a fluid load support of W t F ( ) Z f ∼ 0.85−0.9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability in cartilage strain recovery, indicated by a standard deviation range of ±0.11−2.37%, aligns with findings from prior studies exploring tribological rehydration-induced strain recovery in bovine cartilage. 76,77 This observed strain error represents the inherent mechanical, poroviscoelastic, and thickness variations in cartilage samples harvested across a range of bovine specimens and patellofemoral locations. 78 The observation of strain recovery and subsequent cartilage rehydration increasing with sliding speed demonstrated consistency across all compressive stresses applied to the cartilage, quantified as ε c = 26.1 ± 1.3, 42.0 ± 1.4, and 51.8 ± 3.0% for the 10, 30, and 90 N load conditions, respectively, as summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Spmk-g-peekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[623]. Furthermore, a single, often simplified, loading and motion were applied, while the importance of considering more realistic combined inputs was recognized [624]. A number of studies discussed in this section investigated cartilage and synovial fluid separately, often with simplified configurations of cartilage samples which may not truly reflect the lubrication mechanism in the whole synovial joint system.…”
Section: Natural Synovial Joints and Artificial Joint Replacementsmentioning
confidence: 99%