1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.190095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Scattering error correction of reflecting-tube absorption meters</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
210
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
210
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Absorption data were additionally corrected for scattering losses within the ac9 light path according to the third method of Zaneveld et al (1994), and CDOM absorption was subtracted. SPM concentrations were determined gravimetrically on triplicate, pretared, 0.1-mm pore size, 47-mm-diameter polycarbonate filters (Nucleopore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorption data were additionally corrected for scattering losses within the ac9 light path according to the third method of Zaneveld et al (1994), and CDOM absorption was subtracted. SPM concentrations were determined gravimetrically on triplicate, pretared, 0.1-mm pore size, 47-mm-diameter polycarbonate filters (Nucleopore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of particles to total absorption was assessed as the difference between the unfiltered and filtered values. Temperature and salinity corrections were applied to both absorption and attenuation values [Pegau et al, 1997], and absorption measurements were corrected for scattering errors [Zaneveld et al, 1994]. In addition, the absorption spectra for dissolved material were offset to zero at 676 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth profiles of inherent optical properties were measured using a dual path, multiband absorption/ attenuation meter (ac-9, WETLabs) and backscattering meters (a-␤eta and HydroScat-2, HOBILabs) at a site 80 km from the coast of Portsmouth, New Hampshire (42Њ47ЈN 70Њ05ЈW, 1106 h local time, 30 June 2000). Measurements were corrected for temperature and salinity, and absorption measurements were corrected for scattering errors (Zaneveld et al 1994;Pegau et al 1997). The backscattering meters were calibrated by the manufacturer, and the ac-9 was calibrated on its deployment frame using water generated with a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore Corp.).…”
Section: Calculation Of Underwater Radiances and Irradiances-mentioning
confidence: 99%