1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.197561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Pulsed photothermal radiometry in investigation of tissue destruction caused by CO<formula><inf><roman>2</roman></inf></formula> laser action</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulsed Photothermal Radiometry (PPTR) technique based on the analysis of thermal emission kinetics from tissue subjected by pulsed laser heating is the effective method to investigate laser radiationtissue interaction and to design laser medicine systems with feedback. [1][2][3][4] The thermal emission S (t) registered by PPTR technique is determined by the tissue temperature rise T (x,t) caused by laser irradiation. The temperature rise itself is governed by laser operating conditions as well as optical and thermophysical properties of tissue and boundary conditions of heat transfer (tissue-air).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pulsed Photothermal Radiometry (PPTR) technique based on the analysis of thermal emission kinetics from tissue subjected by pulsed laser heating is the effective method to investigate laser radiationtissue interaction and to design laser medicine systems with feedback. [1][2][3][4] The thermal emission S (t) registered by PPTR technique is determined by the tissue temperature rise T (x,t) caused by laser irradiation. The temperature rise itself is governed by laser operating conditions as well as optical and thermophysical properties of tissue and boundary conditions of heat transfer (tissue-air).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of CO2 laser the dentine destruction is associated with hydroxylapatite evaporation. 4.The comparison between of the dependences of thermal emission from soft tissue for Er:YAG and CO2 lasers are presented on Fig. 10.…”
Section: The Comparison Between Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%