2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.571539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Parametric PSF estimation via sparseness maximization in the wavelet domain</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is justified by the observation that most of the degradations decrease the sparseness of the representation (e.g., wavelets) with respect to the original image [120,121,24]. Figure 5.1 shows an example.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Application To Image Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is justified by the observation that most of the degradations decrease the sparseness of the representation (e.g., wavelets) with respect to the original image [120,121,24]. Figure 5.1 shows an example.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Application To Image Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Other blind approaches try to estimate the PSF based on statistical models of sharp images (Chalmond 1991;Rooms et al 2004;Zhang and Cham 2008;Šroubek et al 2007). Since the blind estimation is an ill-posed problem (blind source separation), strong kernel smoothness assumptions or, equivalently, very simple parametric models are necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Single-channel blind deconvolution within Bayesian framework is considered in [18]. The parameter for Gaussian blur is determined efficiently by wavelet decomposition in [27]. Restoring images degraded by motion blur is discussed in [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%