1980
DOI: 10.1117/12.958272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Optical Properties Of Turbidity Standards</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As recommend by Gibbs [36], Downing [37], Zaneveld et al [38] and Boss et al [20] among others, the calibration was conducted to match the electrical value of the photodetectors to the concentration of suspended sediments (g/L). The concentration of suspended sediments unit was chosen, but an equivalent procedure could be used to calibrate the output to other types of units.…”
Section: In-lab Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommend by Gibbs [36], Downing [37], Zaneveld et al [38] and Boss et al [20] among others, the calibration was conducted to match the electrical value of the photodetectors to the concentration of suspended sediments (g/L). The concentration of suspended sediments unit was chosen, but an equivalent procedure could be used to calibrate the output to other types of units.…”
Section: In-lab Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPM Sensor was developed in a radial configuration, using one infrared backscattering channel (optical receiver placed at 135 • related to the emitter), one infrared nephelometric channel (optical receiver placed at 90 • related to the emitter), and one ultraviolet and one infrared transmitted light channels (optical receiver placed at 0 • related to the emitter). The use of multiples angles to measure turbidity allows a wide dynamic range and precision [25].…”
Section: Sensor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%