1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.366289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
871
0
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,305 publications
(886 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
871
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the source signals are only required to be non-overlapping at some locations of acquisition variable. This sparseness condition was first known in the 1990s [1,22] in the study of blind hyper-spectral unmixing of remote sensing, where the source condition is called pixel purity assumption (PPA) [2]. In 2005, Naanaa and Nuzillard [14] used this assumption to separate the signals in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.…”
Section: Convex Blind Source Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, the source signals are only required to be non-overlapping at some locations of acquisition variable. This sparseness condition was first known in the 1990s [1,22] in the study of blind hyper-spectral unmixing of remote sensing, where the source condition is called pixel purity assumption (PPA) [2]. In 2005, Naanaa and Nuzillard [14] used this assumption to separate the signals in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.…”
Section: Convex Blind Source Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of hyper-spectral unmixing, the resulting geometric (cone) method is the so called N-findr [22], and is now a benchmark in hyper-spectral unmixing. Next we shall review the essentials of the partial spareness condition and the geometric cone method.…”
Section: Convex Blind Source Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents algorithmic challenges for solving the unmixing problem. Several algorithms have been proposed in the context of hyperspectral imaging to solve similar problems [8,9]. Most of these algorithms perform unmixing in a two step procedure where M is estimated first using an endmember extraction algorithm (EEA) followed by a constrained linear least squares step to solve for A.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, these algorithms first find the convex hull defined by the observed data and then fit a minimum volume simplex to it. Aiming at a lower computational complexity, some algorithms such as the pixel purity index (PPI) [15] and the N-FINDR [18] still find the maximum volume simplex that contains the data cloud. They assume the presence of at least one pure pixel of each endmember in the data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%