&lt;title&gt;Measurements of laser-induced damage thresholds for KGSS 0180 neodymium glass surface&lt;/title&gt;

Sirazetdinov, V. S.; Dmitriev, D. I.; Иванова, И. В.; Pasunkin, V. N.; Charukhchev, A. V.

doi:10.1117/12.725612

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in the process of laser irradiation, there are relative differences between the front/input and back/output surfaces according to the direction and position of the laser, which play an important role in the development of laser damage. Numerous studies have been conducted on back and front surface damage; these studies focus on differences in the characteristics of damage profile [8], laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) [9], and damage growth coefficient [10], and explain the cause from the perspective of the damage mechanism [11]. In general, for the coupling effect of plasma with subsequent laser, the growth and extension direction of initial damage are the main factors that determine the difference between the back and front surface damage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference in laser-induced damage behavior between back and front surfaces

Wang

Han

et al. 2020

Laser Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When nanosecond-pulsed laser induces transmission element damage, the coupling effect of plasma and laser affects the damage process of the back and front surfaces, thereby determining the final damage morphology. This study presents the effects on the suppression and enhancement of plasma on particle ejection, the intensity of laser absorption and obstruction, and the surface morphology and drilling efficiency of multi-pulse laser processing. The difference between the back and front surface damage was compared, and the causes and function process were analyzed. Experiments are helpful to understand the role of plasma and the difference in damage between the back and front surfaces so that the thermal mechanism damage is clarified.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference in laser-induced damage behavior between back and front surfaces

Wang

Han

et al. 2020

Laser Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

<title>Statistical analysis of beam resistance test results for KGSS-0180 glass surface</title>

Dmitriev¹,

Иванова²,

Pasunkin³

et al. 2008

SPIE Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results of statistical analysis for beam resistance tests obtained for a new KGSS-0180 neodymium glass are presented. Methods of determining limitations for admissible levels of radiation energy density in the active elements of laser systems based on calculation of statistics for the first term of an ordered data series on glass damage thresholds are proposed. Use of this approach to minimize the impact of "size dependence" on accuracy of determination of a minimal threshold value is considered.

show abstract

<title>Measurements of laser-induced damage thresholds for KGSS 0180 neodymium glass surface</title>

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Difference in laser-induced damage behavior between back and front surfaces

Difference in laser-induced damage behavior between back and front surfaces

<title>Statistical analysis of beam resistance test results for KGSS-0180 glass surface</title>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About