1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.273706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Low-power FLC-based retromodulator communications system</title>

Abstract: On September 15, 1996, researchers from Utah State University / Space Dynamics Lab in conjunction with Phillips Lab / Starfire Optical Range and Kjome Research successfully flew and tested a retromodulator laser communication package on a high altitude balloon. This paper addresses the layout and hardware used for the communication link, as well as presenting some preliminary data collected during the 6 hour flight of the balloon. The package was a proof of concept demonstration system for a low-power laser co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept was successfully demonstrated by the Air Force in 1997 using Ferro Liquid Crystal devices. [4] The concept has also been explored using the Stark effect at 10.6 microns [5] and in the microwave regime [6]. However, these device technologies are inherently slow, can be fragile, and can require high power draws.…”
Section: The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept was successfully demonstrated by the Air Force in 1997 using Ferro Liquid Crystal devices. [4] The concept has also been explored using the Stark effect at 10.6 microns [5] and in the microwave regime [6]. However, these device technologies are inherently slow, can be fragile, and can require high power draws.…”
Section: The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike quantum limited systems in which the noise level increases as the optical contrast ratio decreases the noise level in this case is independent of the optical contrast ratio. (2) where P On is the optical power returned by the MQW MRR when it is in its on-state, P Off is the power returned in the offstate, P noise is the noise equivalent power of the detector, P Ret is the optical power returned by the MRR excluding losses in the MQW modulator, On is the double-pass absorption-length product of the MQW in it's on-state and Off in its offstate. From equation 2 it can be seen that maximizing the OSNR depends on both the optical contrast ratio and the optical transmission of the MQW.…”
Section: Modulating Retro-reflector Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRR demonstrated to date have used a large area modulator placed in front of the aperture, or as one of the faces, of a corner-cube retro-reflector. MRR based on ferroelectric liquid crystals [2], MEMS devices [3] and multiple quantum well (MQW) electro-absorption modulators [4], [5] have been demonstrated recently For both the liquid crystal and MEMS devices the maximum modulation rate is set by the intrinsic switching speed of the material, which are tens of KHz and hundreds of KHz respectively. For the MQW MRR however, the maximum telescope modulation can range into the gigahertz, limited only by the RC time constant of the device.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea was successfully demonstrated by Swenson, et. al., using a balloon in flight with a Ferro Liquid Crystal (FLC) shutter in 1996 [1].…”
Section: Supplementary Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%