1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.179284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Low-bit-rate image compression evaluations</title>

Abstract: In order to assist the National imagery Transmission Format Standard (NITFS) Technical Board (NTB) in selecting new BWC algorithm(s), evaluations of candidate image compression algorithms were performed on the basis of objective and subjective image quality performance, bit rate control, susceptibility to channel errors, and complexity of implementation. Based on these evaluations, which were conducted under the guidance of the NTB, it was concluded that the ISO/JPEG DOT1 compression algorithm was the most sui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Tables 4 and 5, and in Figures 13 and 14. On Lena, the Chui-Lian multiwavelet outperformed both the D 4 and (3,5) scalar wavelets, while the GHM multiwavelet was comparable with D 4 and outperformed (3,5) at compression ratios of 32:1 and 64:1. The images in Figure 13 show that both the approximation-based multiwavelet schemes produce fewer Cartesian artifacts than the scalar wavelet, and the Chui-Lian multiwavelet preserves more detail (e.g.…”
Section: Transform-based Image Codingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in Tables 4 and 5, and in Figures 13 and 14. On Lena, the Chui-Lian multiwavelet outperformed both the D 4 and (3,5) scalar wavelets, while the GHM multiwavelet was comparable with D 4 and outperformed (3,5) at compression ratios of 32:1 and 64:1. The images in Figure 13 show that both the approximation-based multiwavelet schemes produce fewer Cartesian artifacts than the scalar wavelet, and the Chui-Lian multiwavelet preserves more detail (e.g.…”
Section: Transform-based Image Codingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A transformbased coder operates by transforming the data to remove redundancy, then quantizing the transform coefficients (a lossy step), and finally entropy coding the quantizer output. Because of their energy compaction properties and correspondence with the human visual system, wavelet representations have produced superior objective and subjective results in image compression [26,47,2,5]. Since a wavelet basis consists of functions with short support for high frequencies and long support for low frequencies, large smooth areas of an image may be represented with very few bits, and detail added where it is needed.…”
Section: Transform-based Image Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavelet transform ranked first in every case, while JPEG consistently ranked much lower. 12,13 This and other studies 14 strongly suggest the promise of the wavelet transform. …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There already have been many very successful works on image compression [11,14], and a large variety of algorithms have been proposed. A standard compression algorithm, JPEG, is available which will get good results on most images except when the compression ratio is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%