1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.330249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>In-orbit performances of the EIT instrument on board SOHO and intercalibration with the EIT Calroc Sounding Rocket program</title>

Abstract: The Extreme UV Imaging Telescope (EIT) instrument is operating on-board the SOHO spacecraft since January 1996. EIT is providing EUV observations of the solar corona in four narrow channels: 171, 195, 284 and 304 Å. Due to continuous exposure to the EUV solar irradiation, the instrument performance is continuously evolving. The backside thinned detector is showing important changes in its overall response and local damages of EUV highly exposed areas. These performance modifications can be characterized throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar EUV radiation caused the loss of over 80% of EUV responsivity, and also led to instabilities that severely compromised photometric accuracy (see Figure 2). 17,18 An investigation of the damage mechanisms revealed that most of the degradation was caused by EUV-induced surface damage, which formed trap states and led to local charging of the native oxide on the exposed detector surface. The surface damage could only be partially annealed, and the resulting instabilities could not be adequately corrected, prompting the European Space Agency to fly a duplicate instrument on a sounding rocket for recalibration and diagnosis.…”
Section: Surface Passivation Vs Surface Damage: Lessons From the Sohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar EUV radiation caused the loss of over 80% of EUV responsivity, and also led to instabilities that severely compromised photometric accuracy (see Figure 2). 17,18 An investigation of the damage mechanisms revealed that most of the degradation was caused by EUV-induced surface damage, which formed trap states and led to local charging of the native oxide on the exposed detector surface. The surface damage could only be partially annealed, and the resulting instabilities could not be adequately corrected, prompting the European Space Agency to fly a duplicate instrument on a sounding rocket for recalibration and diagnosis.…”
Section: Surface Passivation Vs Surface Damage: Lessons From the Sohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction is based on the assumption that the coordinate information of SOHO/EIT observations is reliable. According to the report of the instrument (Delaboudinière et al 1995) and its on-orbit performance (Defise et al 1998), this is a good assumption.…”
Section: Co-alignment Of the Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground-based programme of EIT provided a complete calibration of the system (Defise et al, 1995), but time constraints during the integration schedule and difficulties in combining it with the priority scheme of the large synchrotron facility Super-ACO at Orsay, as well as the substitution of a new detector after the endto-end test (using silicon diodes calibrated at NIST) reduced the validity of the pre-flight characterization (Defise et al, 1998). Consequently, Dere et al (2000) suggested formal relative combined standard uncertainties at the end of the laboratory calibration of 60 %, 70 %, and 75 % for the 19.5 nm, 28.4 nm, and 30.4 nm channels, respectively.…”
Section: Radiometric Calibration Before Launchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used for deriving SOHO EIT flat-field information (Defise et al, 1998), and provided input for the degradation correction.…”
Section: Inter-calibration Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%