1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.259048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Imaging of disbond in adhesive joints with Lamb waves</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sensitivity of out-of-plane vibration has been confirmed by Mustafa et al [30] when they studied the sensitivity of disbond inspection with Lamb waves.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This sensitivity of out-of-plane vibration has been confirmed by Mustafa et al [30] when they studied the sensitivity of disbond inspection with Lamb waves.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Two situations were considered: (a) lap splice joint disbonds detected as a loss of reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking across the splice; and (b) tearstrap disbond or corrosion observed as an increase of the reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking away in the tear strap. The use of Lamb waves for disbond detection was also reported by Singher et al (1997), Mustafa and Chahbaz (1997), and Todd and Challis (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Guided waves have also been put forward as an alternative mean to detect weak interfaces (Kundu et al, 1998; Lowe and Crawley, 1994; Munns and Georgiou, 1995; Mustafa et al, 1996; Nagy, 1992; Nagy and Adler, 1989; Rokhlin, 1991; Rose, 2000; Smith et al, 2003). Guided waves could be considered a variant of the oblique incidence technique, as in most cases the method was implemented by moving apart the emission and the reception transducer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%