1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.333745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Heavy metal detection combining stripping electrochemistry and piezoelectric sensor technology</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional methods for detecting mercury (II) ions, such as molecular, atomic, or fluorescence spectrometry [7,8], chromatography [9], enzyme-based biosensors [10], fiber optic probes and optical sensors [11,12], pool optode [13], stripping electrochemistry [14][15][16], and stripping electrochemistry coupled with piezoelectric sensor technology [17], are not highly appropriate due to a large sample volume and a long process of sample pretreatment required [18,19] or poor reproducibility [20], among other drawbacks. Thus, it is important to explore alternative techniques that are more accurate and less bulky and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods for detecting mercury (II) ions, such as molecular, atomic, or fluorescence spectrometry [7,8], chromatography [9], enzyme-based biosensors [10], fiber optic probes and optical sensors [11,12], pool optode [13], stripping electrochemistry [14][15][16], and stripping electrochemistry coupled with piezoelectric sensor technology [17], are not highly appropriate due to a large sample volume and a long process of sample pretreatment required [18,19] or poor reproducibility [20], among other drawbacks. Thus, it is important to explore alternative techniques that are more accurate and less bulky and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%