2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.609762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Fluctuations in models of biological macroevolution (Invited Paper)</title>

Abstract: Fluctuations in diversity and extinction sizes are discussed and compared for two different, individual-based models of biological coevolution. Both models display power-law distributions for various quantities of evolutionary interest, such as the lifetimes of individual species, the quiet periods between evolutionary upheavals larger than a given cutoff, and the sizes of extinction events. Time series of the diversity and measures of the size of extinctions give rise to flicker noise. Surprisingly, the power… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlations further increase the proportion of very long QSS (figure 5b), but curiously they also lead to an increase of intermediate-lifetime species (figure 4). These effects do not seem very easy to reconcile, but we speculate that they may be due to a decoupling of the species lifetimes and the QSS durations that has been observed in an uncorrelated predator-prey version of this model [9]. The increased activity in the intermediate-time regime results in increased intensity in the higher-frequency half of the PSD (figure 6b).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The correlations further increase the proportion of very long QSS (figure 5b), but curiously they also lead to an increase of intermediate-lifetime species (figure 4). These effects do not seem very easy to reconcile, but we speculate that they may be due to a decoupling of the species lifetimes and the QSS durations that has been observed in an uncorrelated predator-prey version of this model [9]. The increased activity in the intermediate-time regime results in increased intensity in the higher-frequency half of the PSD (figure 6b).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this paper we have considered the effects of introducing correlations between the elements of the interaction matrix M that determines the interspecies interactions in an individual-based coevolution model [7,8,9], in which individuals are represented by a genome in the form of a bitstring of length L. The correlations were introduced by replacing each element M 0 ij in an uncorrelated interaction matrix with the average over all the elements M 0 kl such that the Hamming distance between the concatenated bitstrings ij and kl is less than or equal to n, and then reweighting the resulting matrix element M ij such as to maintain the standard deviation of its probability density unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tanglednature model is an individual-based model, originally introduced by Hall and co-workers [17] and later simplified by Rikvold and Zia [20]. In the simplified models [18][19][20][21][22]30], the population evolves stochastically in discrete, non-overlapping generations. In these models, each individual of species I gives rise to F offspring with a reproduction probability P I before it dies.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%