2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.390035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Experimental validation of a thermal model used to predict the image placement error of a scanned EUVL reticle</title>

Abstract: Lithographic masks must maintain dimensional stability during exposure in a lithographic tool to minimize subsequent overlay errors. In extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL), multilayer coatings are deposited on a mask substrate to make the mask surface reflective at EUV wavelengths. About 40% of the incident EUV light is absorbed by the multilayer coating which leads to a temperature rise. The choice of mask substrate material and absorber affects the magnitude of thermal distortion. Finite element modeling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A contact conductance of 150 W/m 2 -K was originally estimated for clamping of the EUVL reticle to the flat chuck. 10 Because of the uncertainty of this contact condition, (influenced by the thermal conductivities of substrate and chuck, surface roughness, and interface pressure), a sensitivity study of the effect of contact conductance between the wafer and chuck was performed. In the thermal simulations, resist sensitivities of 10 mJ/cm 2 and 20 mJ/cm 2 were used for EUVL and 193-nm optical, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Wafer-to-chuck Contact Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contact conductance of 150 W/m 2 -K was originally estimated for clamping of the EUVL reticle to the flat chuck. 10 Because of the uncertainty of this contact condition, (influenced by the thermal conductivities of substrate and chuck, surface roughness, and interface pressure), a sensitivity study of the effect of contact conductance between the wafer and chuck was performed. In the thermal simulations, resist sensitivities of 10 mJ/cm 2 and 20 mJ/cm 2 were used for EUVL and 193-nm optical, respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Wafer-to-chuck Contact Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, thermal issues have been investigated only for the device wafer chucking. [1][2][3] Recently however, the research on thermal issues has spread to the reticle side of the manufacturing process. [4][5][6][7][8] One concern is that particles may become lodged between the chuck and reticle, inducing distortions once the reticle is chucked flat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Thermomechanical analyses of electrostatic-chucked wafers have been previously investigated. [1][2][3][4] In this paper, the thermomechanical response of an EUV reticle during exposure has been determined, and preliminary design curves will be presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%