2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.502638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Evaluation model considering static-temporal quality degradation and human memory for SSCQE video quality</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ninassi et al [36] proposed to take into account the temporal variation of spatial distortions in the temporal pooling process. In [24], [37], and [38], the authors considered the asymmetric human behavior in responding to quality degradation and improvement.…”
Section: B Exploiting Temporal Information For Video Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ninassi et al [36] proposed to take into account the temporal variation of spatial distortions in the temporal pooling process. In [24], [37], and [38], the authors considered the asymmetric human behavior in responding to quality degradation and improvement.…”
Section: B Exploiting Temporal Information For Video Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with our preliminary work [40] in which motion information of the video was not considered and with most previous studies, the contribution of the proposed VQM comes from the extensive use of motion information to simulate the HVS processing, that is, motion vectors are derived in the wavelet domain, and employed in the eye-movement model, the spatiovelocity CSF, the motion-based temporal masking, and so on. We also simulate cognitive human behavior, which originally was proposed to be used in continuous quality evaluations [37], [38], and have proved its effectiveness in sequence-level quality prediction. In Section II-B, an introduction is given on how the previous VQMs use motion information and HVS characteristics for video quality assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also classify PVQMs with regard to reference requirements: doubleended and single-ended. Double-ended metrics require both the reference (original) signal and the test (processed) signal, and can be further divided into two subclasses: reduced-reference (RR) metrics [57,185] that need only part of the reference signal and full-reference (FR) ones [17,139,140,167]) that need the complete reference signal. Single-ended metrics use only the processed signal, and are therefore also called no-reference (NR) ones [35,120,189].…”
Section: Perceptual Visual Quality Metrics (Pvqms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric performed well in the VQEG FR-TV Phase II Test [157]. For another RR metric proposed in [57], spatial features are computed for the luminance image, and temporal features are obtained by the frame difference and global motion detection.…”
Section: Metrics With Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only partial information or no information of the original image or video is available, RR and NR IQA measures can be utilized. RR measures often extract important features from the original image or video, and utilize these features to assist quality assessment [11,32]. NR measures directly infer the quality of the degraded image or video, for example based on natural scene statistics (NSS) [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%