2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.417292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Distributed robotic mapping of extreme environments</title>

Abstract: In the extreme environments posed by war fighting, fire fighting, and nuclear accident response, the cost of direct human exposure is levied in terms of injury and death. Robotic alternatives must address effective operations while removing humans from danger. This is profoundly challenging, as extreme environments inflict cumulative performance damage on exposed robotic agents. Sensing and perception are among the most vulnerable components. We present a distributed robotic system that enables autonomous reco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in typically non-competitive environments) as opposed to competitive multirobot domains and competitive inter-agent interactions in domains such as E-commerce. Simulation results using this approach were produced by Dias and Stentz [3], and proven robot results were presented by Thayer et al [11], and Zlot et al [13]. A brief introduction to this approach is presented here.…”
Section: The Market Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in typically non-competitive environments) as opposed to competitive multirobot domains and competitive inter-agent interactions in domains such as E-commerce. Simulation results using this approach were produced by Dias and Stentz [3], and proven robot results were presented by Thayer et al [11], and Zlot et al [13]. A brief introduction to this approach is presented here.…”
Section: The Market Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stentz and Dias [10] proposed a more capable market-based approach for multirobot coordination which aims to opportunistically introduce pockets of centralized optimal planning into a distributed system, thereby exploiting the desirable properties of both distributed and centralized approaches. Thayer et al [11], Gerkey and Mataric [4], and Zlot et al [13] have since produced market-based multirobot coordination results. Economic approaches are not without their disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hettiarachchi and Spears, 2005;Wagner and Bruckstein, 2001;Steels, 1990) or (Arkin, 1990;Mataric, 1992;Haynes and Sen, 1986) for biology inspired designs (behavior based control models, flocking and dispersing models and predator-prey approaches, respectively), (Gerkey and Mataric, 2002;Rabideau et al, 1999;Thayer et al, 2000) for economics applications and (Chevallier and Payandeh, 2000) for a physics inspired approach).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] or [4][5][6] for biology inspired designs (behavior based control models, flocking and dispersing models and predator-prey approaches, respectively), [7][8][9][10] for economics applications and [11] for a physics inspired approach).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%