2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.381634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Data fusion and processing for airborne multichannel system of radar remote sensing: methodology, stages, and algorithms</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the data presented in [11,19], Aiazzi et al underlines that small local variations of true image values that correspond to radar cross-section variations induced by local heterogeneity of surface backscattering should be preserved after image filtering; and these variations can be considered as texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly to the data presented in [11,19], Aiazzi et al underlines that small local variations of true image values that correspond to radar cross-section variations induced by local heterogeneity of surface backscattering should be preserved after image filtering; and these variations can be considered as texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For optical and infrared images it is commonly assumed that the dominant noise is additive and its probability density function (pdf) is close to Gaussian [8]. For microwave radar imagery the prevailing influence of multiplicative noise is typical and its pdf can be either close to Gaussian or essentially non-Gaussian depending upon the radar type and its characteristics [2,5,9,10,11]. This noise is commonly rather intensive and clearly observed visually in microwave images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The text representation of the designed LAF is the following: (1, 1, 0.0000, 2, 3), (2, 2, 0.0030, 4, 5), (4, 2, 0.0027, 6, 7), (6, 3, 0.0000, 8, 9), (8, 1), (9, 6), (7, 1), (5, 4, 0.0000, 10, 11), (10, 1), (11, 4, 0.0768, 12, 13), (12,1), (13,4), (3, 5, 0.2308, 14, 15), (14, 1, 0.4588, 16, 17), ( 16, 2, 0.0094, 18, 19), (18, 1, 0.1413, 20, 21 There are 10 used LAIs (18 thresholds) and 7 filters. The filters are enumerated as: 1 -DCT-based filter [14]; 2 -Idempotent filter; 3 -5x5 Local statistic Lee filter [7]; 4 -5x5 Modified sigma filter [15]; 5 -FIR-median hybrid filter 3LH+ [16]; 6 -5x5 Median filter; 7 -5x5 Standard sigma filter [17].…”
Section: Filtering For Better Object Detection In Imagesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Often noise presence considerably prevents reliable interpretation and classification of images, in particular, accurate estimation of sensed terrain parameters [4]. Thus, image denoising is a key stage in image processing [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%