1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.351563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>DARPA/ARFL/NASA Smart Wing second wind tunnel test results</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is comparable to the lift increases seen by other researchers. Scherer, et al [17], for instance, achieved a Dc l that ranged from 0.03 to 0.09, based on SMA-actuated trailing edge deflections. However, the achieved Dc l is considerably less than the Dc l predicted by the numerical models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is comparable to the lift increases seen by other researchers. Scherer, et al [17], for instance, achieved a Dc l that ranged from 0.03 to 0.09, based on SMA-actuated trailing edge deflections. However, the achieved Dc l is considerably less than the Dc l predicted by the numerical models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase I of the program produced a 16 percent scale F18-E/F planform Smart Wing with embedded SMAs to actuate seamless trailing edge control surfaces 6 and generate wing twist 7 . The Smart Wing underwent two series of wind tunnel tests in the NASA Langley (LaRC) Transonic Dynamics Tunnel; the first in May, 1996 8 , and the second in July, 1998 9 . Accurate, in-situ measurement of the Smart Wing shape and deformation during these developmental wind tunnel tests was critical in understanding relationships between control surface actuation and aerodynamic reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external measurement techniques, however, proved to be more accurate and reliable. 9 A LaRC-developed optical Video Model Deformation (VMD) system based on single camera / single view photogrammetry was used as the primary Smart Wing deformation measurement tool during both wind tunnel entries. A single component Projection Moiré Interferometry (PMI) system with full field measurement capability was also used during the second wind tunnel entry to complement the more accurate VMD system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, more effective placement strategies along the leading edge were investigated to provide robust control. Similar to this approach are techniques using smart materials to create large scale deflections that would replace control surfaces [12], [20], [6].…”
Section: Modelling and Control Of Morphing Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aeroelastic deformations then are used to decrease drag, reduce maneuver loads, and reduce weight of the aircraft. The AAW project has been applied to a F-18 testbed and has demonstrated that it is able to show improvements in performance and aeroelastic deformation with minimal control effort (when compared to a method such as [12], [20], [6]). However, in this instance the objective is not flight control but performance improvement.…”
Section: Modelling and Control Of Morphing Wingmentioning
confidence: 99%