<title>Comparison of modeled to measured infrared multispectral target/background signatures</title>

<title>Infrared multispectral target/background field measurements</title>

“…Assuming the instability is similar at the 20 °C and 45 °C setpoints where calibration measurements are made, the relative calibration accuracy of the entire system can be shown to be dL,1 1 1L VLH-LcKT HKT2 C)aCAL (2) …”

“…In particular, this paper contains the specification and characterization of the data collection instrument, a description of the data collection site and targets, and a summary of the spectral measurements made. The analysis and model comparisons of the collected data are described in separate papers [1,2].…”

Resolved target detection in clutter using correlated, dual-band imagery

“…It extends the classical approach development of Stotts and Hoff 21 to dual-band target detection. This approach assumes that the target profile is contained in a fixed number of pixels since many applications use detection as the first step to classification and identification of the target, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] namely, MF detection (leakage of background clutter into edge pixels reduces the maximum filter gain but usually not by a large amount because of the potentially large number of pixels a resolved image contains [1][2][3] ). The reason for only looking at two bands is that many previous research papers have found that "additive noise" detector performances with real data are lower as we spread the processing gain across many bands, which will be discussed in the next section.…”