1993
DOI: 10.1117/12.162045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer theory for sensing: a practitioner's approach</title>

Abstract: This paper presents an applied practical comparison of Bayesian and Dernpster-Sliafer techniques useful for managing uncertainty in sensing. Three formulations of the same example are presented: a Bayesian, a naive Dempster-Shafer, and a Dempster-Shafer approach using a refined frame of discernment. Both the Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer (with a refined frame of discernment) yield similar results; however, information content and representations are different between the two methods. Bayesian theory requires a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several works [15,23] have pointed out that while Bayes' theorem is most suited to problems where there are probabilities for all events, it is least suited to problems where there is partial or complete ignorance, and limited or conflicting information. The Dempster-Shafer theory, on the other hand, can model various types of partial ignorance and limited or conflicting evidence: it is a more flexible model than Bayes' theorem.…”
Section: Probabilistic Lexical Annotationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, several works [15,23] have pointed out that while Bayes' theorem is most suited to problems where there are probabilities for all events, it is least suited to problems where there is partial or complete ignorance, and limited or conflicting information. The Dempster-Shafer theory, on the other hand, can model various types of partial ignorance and limited or conflicting evidence: it is a more flexible model than Bayes' theorem.…”
Section: Probabilistic Lexical Annotationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[8,9] also discussed the problems of target classification within the TBM framework. Comparisons between the Bayesian classifier and the classifier based on the Dempster-Shafer theory lead to the general conclusion that the latter is more robust than the former [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A comparison of the Bayesian and DS approaches in [25] illustrates that the two techniques can lead to similar results but that a well-defined formulation of probabilities, conditioning and priors is required in the Bayes method, whereas in the DS theory, conditioning is incorporated in the belief functions with no prior knowledge needed. A discussion of the similarities and differences between the two approaches is also given in [26].…”
Section: Dempster-shafer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%