1991
DOI: 10.1117/12.48223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Clinical optical dose measurement for PDT: invasive and noninvasive techniques</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, radiant energy fluence rate is used to describe the light in the tissue since this quantity is related in a straightforward way to the radiant energy absorbed in the tissue, particularly by the sensitizer. From an experimental point of view, the radiant energy fluence rate is measured by using an isotropic optical probe [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], i.e., a detector with an omnidirectional sensitivity to the light. Irradiance is preferentially used to describe the light transferred at the boundaries, e.g., at the tissue surface or at the surface of the light distributor.…”
Section: Light Distributormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Usually, radiant energy fluence rate is used to describe the light in the tissue since this quantity is related in a straightforward way to the radiant energy absorbed in the tissue, particularly by the sensitizer. From an experimental point of view, the radiant energy fluence rate is measured by using an isotropic optical probe [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], i.e., a detector with an omnidirectional sensitivity to the light. Irradiance is preferentially used to describe the light transferred at the boundaries, e.g., at the tissue surface or at the surface of the light distributor.…”
Section: Light Distributormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method consists of measuring this distribution by inserting an optical microprobe with an isotropic response [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in the tissue. The position of the microprobe in the tissue must be known accurately and the microprobe should not significantly perturb the light distribution in the tissues.…”
Section: Light Distribution In Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical values of g for soft tissue and 500-900 nm light vary between 0.7 and 0.99 [14]. The effective scattering coefficient Ј s ‫ס‬ s (1 − g) of the lung phantom was measured as 0.35 mm −1 by a non-invasive technique based on the measurement of the diffuse reflectance [15,16]. The predicted value was 0.3 mm −1 .…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visible radiation to be measured also causes broad band tissue/phantom autofluorescence which could interfere with the measurement of the isotropic probe [15]. Part of this autofluorescence, near 693 nm, interferes by directly entering the fiber.…”
Section: Radiant Energy Fluence Rate Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%