&lt;title&gt;Browsing through rapid-fire imaging: requirements and industry initiatives&lt;/title&gt;

Wittenburg, Kent; Chiyoda, Carlos; Heinrichs, Michael; Lanning, Tom

doi:10.1117/12.373476

Cited by 12 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As well as the modes shown in Figure 1, Wittenburg et al ([18], [19]) described the 'floating' mode ( Figure 2, left) in which images appear to start 'a long way away' and then 'move towards' the viewer, in a manner similar to that in which motorway signs appear to move towards you when driving. Also incorporating manual control of the display, Witkowski et al ([17]) describe a kiosk based sales scenario in which potential customers could rapidly scroll through a large (~450) database of product images (e.g.…”

Section: Image Presentation Modesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of static and moving presentation modes for image collections

Cooper

Bruijn

Spence

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI '06

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In both professional and personal contexts, a common activity is the search for a target image among a collection of images. The presentation of that collection to a user can assume a wide variety of forms, and it would help interaction designers to be aware of the comparative properties of available presentation modes. A property of major interest is the percentage of correct identification of the presence or absence of the target image within the collection; another is users' acceptance of a presentation mode. Several modes of Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) are compared for effectiveness in a number of image identification tasks, and with regard to user acceptance and stated preference.Presentation modes have been classified as static or moving. For a selected representative group of three static and three moving modes, for three image presentation times and for three tasks of increasing complexity, we report experimental results which in most cases establish, with a high degree of statistical confidence, that -over the range of independent variables investigated -(a) static modes are more successful with regard to identification success than moving modes; (b) static modes are far more preferred than moving ones; (c) identification success generally increases with increase in presentation time per image; (d) for mixed and tile modes, identification success is relatively insensitive to image presentation time; and (e) success rate decreases with increase in task complexity except, notably, for slide-show and mixed modes. Evidence from eye-gaze records suggests that the eye-gaze strategy adopted by a subject exerts a very strong influence on both identification success and mode preference. Conclusions are drawn about guidance that can be offered to an interaction designer.

show abstract

Section: Image Presentation Modesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of static and moving presentation modes for image collections

Cooper

Bruijn

Spence

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI '06

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of initial pilot experiments [6] [20] have not yielded any evidence to date that these more sophisticated RSVP techniques are actually superior to the simple keyhole mode. Suggestive results so far are that users preferred a keyhole mode presentation of images in an e-commerce shopping task over a particular instance of collage mode [20] and that no advantage of carousel mode over keyhole mode was found in an image recognition task [6].…”

Section: Recent Digital Video Recording Devices Such As Tivomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These methods have the virtue of simplicity of controls, a major advantage to designers of consumer devices. The basic controls for such presentations require only methods for direction and variable speed, much like the controls necessary for fast-forwarding or reversing a video recorder [20].…”

Section: Recent Digital Video Recording Devices Such As Tivomentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid serial visual presentation techniques for consumer digital video devices

Wittenburg

Forlines

Lanning

et al. 2003

Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we propose a new model for a class of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) interfaces [16] in the context of consumer video devices. The basic spatial layout explodes a sequence of image frames into a 3D trail in order to provide more context for a spatial/temporal presentation. As the user plays forward or back, the trail advances or recedes while the image in the foreground focus position is replaced. The design is able to incorporate a variety of methods for analyzing or highlighting images in the trail. Our hypotheses are that users can navigate more quickly and precisely to points of interest when compared to conventional consumer-based browsing, channel flipping, or fast-forwarding techniques. We report on an experiment testing our hypotheses in which we found that subjects were more accurate but not faster in browsing to a target of interest in recorded television content with a TV remote. UIST 2003This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. ABSTRACTIn this paper we propose a new model for a class of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) interfaces [16] in the context of consumer video devices. The basic spatial layout "explodes" a sequence of image frames into a 3D trail in order to provide more context for a spatial/temporal presentation. As the user plays forward or back, the trail advances or recedes while the image in the foreground focus position is replaced. The design is able to incorporate a variety of methods for analyzing or highlighting images in the trail. Our hypotheses are that users can navigate more quickly and precisely to points of interest when compared to conventional consumer-based browsing, channel flipping, or fast-forwarding techniques. We report on an experiment testing our hypotheses in which we found that subjects were more accurate but not faster in browsing to a target of interest in recorded television content with a TV remote.

show abstract

“…al. [16] have not only demonstrated such control, but have commented upon the design issues that arise. There are many opportunities for further research.…”

Section: Directions For Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A shopper presented with a new catalogue, for example, will often riffle through its pages to find products of potential interest [16]. Or a television viewer may examine a collection of 'stills' taken from a film to identify the 'gist' of the film sufficiently well to decide whether to view it [12,15].…”

Section: Many Tasks Involve the Perception And Interpretation Of Imagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Image presentation in space and time

Spence

Witkowski

Fawcett

et al. 2004

Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a technique that allows images to be presented sequentially in the time-domain, thereby offering an alternative to the conventional concurrent display of images in the space domain. Such an alternative offers potential advantages where display area is at a premium. However, notwithstanding the flexibility to employ either or both domains for presentation purposes, little is known about the alternatives suited to specific tasks undertaken by a user. As a consequence there is a pressing need to provide guidance for the interaction designer faced with these alternatives.We investigated the task of identifying the presence or absence of a previously viewed image within a collection of images, a requirement of many real activities. In experiments with subjects, the collection of images was presented in three modes (1) 'slide show' RSVP mode; (2) concurrently and statically -'static mode'; and (3) a 'mixed' mode. Each mode employed the same display area and the same total presentation time, together regarded as primary resources available to the interaction designer. For each presentation mode, the outcome identified error profiles and subject preferences. Eye-gaze studies detected distinctive differences between the three presentation modes.

show abstract

<title>Browsing through rapid-fire imaging: requirements and industry initiatives</title>

Cited by 12 publications

References 5 publications

A comparison of static and moving presentation modes for image collections

A comparison of static and moving presentation modes for image collections

Rapid serial visual presentation techniques for consumer digital video devices

Image presentation in space and time

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About