2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.428346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Atom interferometry with Mg beams</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orientation of the magnetic field inside the apparatus defines a preferred quantization axis, which in turn determines the polarization of laser beams. In the different Zeeman slower implementations, the magnetic field is either colinear [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] or orthogonal to the atom propagation axis [9][10][11][12][13]. In the first case, pure circular polarization of the laser beam is achievable, allowing for an atom-light interaction limited to a cycling transition,within an effective two-level system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation of the magnetic field inside the apparatus defines a preferred quantization axis, which in turn determines the polarization of laser beams. In the different Zeeman slower implementations, the magnetic field is either colinear [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] or orthogonal to the atom propagation axis [9][10][11][12][13]. In the first case, pure circular polarization of the laser beam is achievable, allowing for an atom-light interaction limited to a cycling transition,within an effective two-level system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (see also Ref. 4 for a somewhat different approach formerly used). Here, we present an alternative design based on a Halbach configuration 5 of the magnets and demonstrate fully satisfactory operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%