2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.479080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Algorithms and architecture for airborne minefield detection</title>

Abstract: The current minefield detection approach is based on a sequential processing employing mine detection followed by minefield detection. In case of patterned minefield, minefield detection algorithms seek to exploit the minefield pattern (such as linearity) while in case of scattered minefield they utilize the spatial distribution of the mine targets. However, significant challenges remain in adequate modeling and detection of the minefield process especially in the presence of false alarms due to cultured as we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation among the bands was addressed by using a i-naximumu noise fraction transform to generate independent bands. Agarwal et al [86] propose(] a false alarm mitigation scheme using gray-scale moments, which preserved the shape and intensity profiles of mine signatures. Support vector machines [87,88].…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation among the bands was addressed by using a i-naximumu noise fraction transform to generate independent bands. Agarwal et al [86] propose(] a false alarm mitigation scheme using gray-scale moments, which preserved the shape and intensity profiles of mine signatures. Support vector machines [87,88].…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%